Progress in Understanding of Polymer Crystallization
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47307-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologies of Polymer Crystals in Thin Films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Layer‐multiplying coextrusion provides a flexible processing tool to decrease individual layer thicknesses through the microscale and approaching the nanoscale dimensions of individual polymer molecules. Crystalline polymers confined in ultrathin spin‐coated layers,37, 38 or microphase separated block structures containing at least one crystallizable block,39 have produced specific crystal orientations and unique lamellar morphologies. One dimensional confinement of crystalline polymers by layer‐multiplying coextrusion provides an advantage over the preceding techniques in the ability to achieve long range, defect free nano‐confinement in films with thousands of individual layers.…”
Section: Nanolayered Polymer Systems With Improved Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Layer‐multiplying coextrusion provides a flexible processing tool to decrease individual layer thicknesses through the microscale and approaching the nanoscale dimensions of individual polymer molecules. Crystalline polymers confined in ultrathin spin‐coated layers,37, 38 or microphase separated block structures containing at least one crystallizable block,39 have produced specific crystal orientations and unique lamellar morphologies. One dimensional confinement of crystalline polymers by layer‐multiplying coextrusion provides an advantage over the preceding techniques in the ability to achieve long range, defect free nano‐confinement in films with thousands of individual layers.…”
Section: Nanolayered Polymer Systems With Improved Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, polymer thin films have been a subject of academic debates for over the past 20 years [28][29][30][31]. In the particular case of semicrystalline polymers, the confinement imposed by the thin film geometry, and the polymer-substrate adsorption effects, resulted in differences in the crystallization rate [32,33], crystalline morphology [34][35][36], thermal transitions and polymers' molecular dynamics [32,37]. In turn, preparing poly(alkylene 2,5-furanoate)s can be also a way to tune their physical properties, at nanoscale levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFM results show that UV–LC has the best surface roughness with a root mean square roughness of ≈2.3 nm while UV–SilkHTP (≈8.5 nm) is better than UV–Silk30 (≈23.8 nm), over an area of 5 × 5 µm. We postulate that, during drying, silk fibroin proteins spontaneously form micro and nanoscale wrinkled patterns guided by a diffusion‐limited aggregation process which has been observed in the assembly of a range of materials including colloids, polymer thin films, peptides, and proteins . This is partially due to the polarity mismatch between photoreactive silk resists consisting of strongly polar side groups, such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, and amino groups (thus strongly polar) and the IPA‐treated silicon (weakly polar) substrate, which can be improved by appropriate surface treatment of silicon substrates (details in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%