2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologies and electromagnetic interference shielding performances of microcellular epoxy/multi-wall carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of the expandable microsphere expansion, the CB fillers gradually enriched and aggregated in the place near the external surface of the microspheres. This significantly helped to form am effective conductive path . In our study, the expected redistribution of CB filler was skillfully achieved via flowing epoxy caused by thermal expansion of the microspheres.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result of the expandable microsphere expansion, the CB fillers gradually enriched and aggregated in the place near the external surface of the microspheres. This significantly helped to form am effective conductive path . In our study, the expected redistribution of CB filler was skillfully achieved via flowing epoxy caused by thermal expansion of the microspheres.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As we all know, epoxy foam is a representative rigid thermoset foam with the typical aforementioned characteristics . Recently, a kind of porous epoxy–MWCNT composite was fabricated with a supercritical CO 2 foaming method, and the electromagnetic interference shielding properties of the foams were systematically investigated. However, this process would have been difficult to be widely used on an industrial scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the initial studies, Yang et al [5] developed polystyrene foams obtaining shielding efficiencies (SE) around 20 dB with 15 wt.% and 7 wt.% carbon nanofibers and nanotubes, respectively. Subsequent works improved the SE or decreased the loading fractions required to achieve commercially attractive EMI shielding materials (around 20 dB in the X-band region (8.2-12.4 GHz)) and mostly looked at thermoplastic or rigid thermoset matrices or coated the foam surfaces with conductive nanofillers [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. These previous studies have demonstrated that the development of the cellular structure causes the redistribution of the nanoparticles, decreasing the average gap between the nanoparticles along the cell walls, thus enhancing the electrical conductivity and EMI shielding properties [9,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extremely low electrical conductivity of the nanocomposite foams in our work is attributed to the selective orientation of MWCNTs at the cell walls, which is detrimental to the formation of conductive networks. In contrast, Li et al proposed an opposite perspective when they investigated the effects of foaming on the electrical conductivity of the epoxy/MWCNT nanocomposite foams. They deemed that the nanocomposite foams exhibit a higher electrical conductivity than the unfoamed material because the squeezed distance between MWCNTs by the epoxy stretch during cell growth leads to the enrichment of MWCNTs at the cell walls and the struts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%