2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological variation in Japanese compounds: The case of hoodai and the notion of “compound-specific submeaning”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because I do not take a stance on the categorial issue of keeyoodoosi here, I use the original neutral terminology in this section (cf. also Nishiyama, 1999;Kageyama, 2010;Namiki, 2010).…”
Section: Accent In Keeyoodoosimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because I do not take a stance on the categorial issue of keeyoodoosi here, I use the original neutral terminology in this section (cf. also Nishiyama, 1999;Kageyama, 2010;Namiki, 2010).…”
Section: Accent In Keeyoodoosimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this format expresses that the specific bound meaning is potentially productive, because the other position in the constructional idiom is a variable. 2 2 The relevance of the notion constructional idiom at the word level for the proper characterization of the affixoid behaviour of words has also been argued to be relevant for languages such as Greek (Ralli et al 2008), French ( Van Goethem 2008, Mandarin Chinese (Arcodia 2011) and Japanese (Namiki 2010). A constructional idiom analysis of some German affixoids (-stück, -fall and -werk) is defended in Zifonun (2012).…”
Section: Affixoids and Constructional Idiomsmentioning
confidence: 99%