2016
DOI: 10.18500/1816-9775-2016-16-1-80-90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Variability in Populations of Chondrilla L. (Asteraceae) in European Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is probably obligately apomictic being able to reproduce by seeds. Thorough studies of morphology, Kashin et al (2016Kashin et al ( , 2018a lead us to the conclusion that only C. ambigua is a morphologically well separated species, whereas the others are poorly differentiated and should be lumped under the name C. juncea. However, C. brevirostris, C. laticoronata and C. pauciflora seem to be somewhat morphologically separate from the latter, though their status and position remain questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is probably obligately apomictic being able to reproduce by seeds. Thorough studies of morphology, Kashin et al (2016Kashin et al ( , 2018a lead us to the conclusion that only C. ambigua is a morphologically well separated species, whereas the others are poorly differentiated and should be lumped under the name C. juncea. However, C. brevirostris, C. laticoronata and C. pauciflora seem to be somewhat morphologically separate from the latter, though their status and position remain questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%