“…However, evidence has been accumulating over many years that C. major is actually a species complex (Rodrigues and Shimizu 1997;Felder 1998, 1999a, b, c;Staton and Felder 1995;Felder and Robles 2009;Peiró 2012). Yet, the name continues to be widely and frequently used in ecological, distributional, morphological, checklists, and taxonomic researches carried out along its implied geographic distribution (Rodrigues 1966(Rodrigues , 1971(Rodrigues , 1983Souza and Borzone 1996;Blanco-Rambla 1997;Souza et al 1998;Coelho et al 2007;Botter-Carvalho et al 2007;Botter-Carvalho et al 2012;Rio et al 2019;Souza et al 2020). The current lack of clarity in the use of the name C. major has hence resulted in nomenclatural instability, but also in unreliability and miscommunication of the available ecological and distributional information.…”