2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2016.00102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Neuron Classification Using Machine Learning

Abstract: Classification and quantitative characterization of neuronal morphologies from histological neuronal reconstruction is challenging since it is still unclear how to delineate a neuronal cell class and which are the best features to define them by. The morphological neuron characterization represents a primary source to address anatomical comparisons, morphometric analysis of cells, or brain modeling. The objectives of this paper are (i) to develop and integrate a pipeline that goes from morphological feature ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant group differences are presented with whisker plots ( Figure 8F) and the FDR q-value significance level is visualized in a matrix ( Figure 8E). Furthermore, we used principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce the dimensionality of all measured morphological parameters and create a 3D scatterplot illustrating the segregation of BLAa domain specific neurons based on the measured features ( Figure 8B) 51,52 . Statistically significant differences in several morphological features were detected across all pairwise comparisons; however, neurons in BLA.am and BLA.al generally showed greater similarity to one another than they each did to BLA.ac.…”
Section: Blaa Neuron Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significant group differences are presented with whisker plots ( Figure 8F) and the FDR q-value significance level is visualized in a matrix ( Figure 8E). Furthermore, we used principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce the dimensionality of all measured morphological parameters and create a 3D scatterplot illustrating the segregation of BLAa domain specific neurons based on the measured features ( Figure 8B) 51,52 . Statistically significant differences in several morphological features were detected across all pairwise comparisons; however, neurons in BLA.am and BLA.al generally showed greater similarity to one another than they each did to BLA.ac.…”
Section: Blaa Neuron Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the anisotropic dimensions of the voxels and spatial undersampling relative to the curvature of the dendrite, we applied a local regression filter to address the aliasing artifact and to regularize dendritic tortuosity. Specifically, the NeuronFilter module in QIT was used to apply a locally weighted scatter-plot smoother (LOESS), which is a low bias approach that makes minimal assumptions (Supplementary Figure 1H 51,52 . The PCA shows the segregation of BLAa domain specific neurons based on the measured features ( Figure 8B).…”
Section: D Workflow For Assessment Of Neuronal Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, one could consider building a library of reliable stretches and use machine learning to recognize analyzable dendrites during high-content screening. Although relatively new in the field of neuroscience, machine learning approaches have already been used for tracing of neurites ( Gala et al, 2014 ), and to classify cortical neurons in histological sections according to their morphology ( Vasques et al, 2016 ). Recently, a machine learning approach was also used for spine classification, which outperformed morphological feature-based methods ( Ghani et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Dendritic Spines As Morphological Correlates Of Excitatory Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we focus the attention in the use of morphological features for supervised classification, which has been less treated and has shown better results than unsupervised techniques [14,23]. In this case, a priori information which is used in unsupervised algorithms only to validate the classification process, allowed us to build our models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%