“…When analyzing the results of working women aged 35.2 years [4] it can be concluded that the prevalence of underweight and obese was 2.14 (9.64 vs 30.27 %) and 2.22 (3.13 vs 10.09 %) higher in relation to the results of this study. Wilks' lambda = 0.122, p = 0.000, ɳ 2 = 0.409 Wilks' lambda = 0.347, p = 0.000, ɳ 2 = 0.232 ANOVA F = 29.59, p = 0.000 F = 30.33, p = 0.000 F = 508.44, p = 0.000 F = 31.46, p = 0.000 F = 157.7, p = 0.000 F = 138.0, p = 0.000 F = 157.6, p = 0.000 F = 173.9, p = 0.000 Legend: * p = 0.000, statistically significant differences between all groups; # p = 0.000, Overweight I vs. all other BMI subgroups except Overweight II, Obese I, II and III; § p = 0.000, Overweight II vs. all other BMI subgroups, except Overweight I, Obese I, II and III; ¥ p = 0.005, Obese I vs. all other BMI subgroups, except Overweight I and II, Obese II and III; £ p = 0.001, Obese II vs. all other BMI subgroups, except Overweight I and II, Obese I and III; † p = 0.001, Obese III vs. all other BMI subgroups, except Overweight I and II, Obese I and II; @ p = 0.000, Normal range I vs. all other BMI subgroups, except Obese III; & p < 0.05, Normal range II vs. all other BMI subgroups, except Overweight II and Obese III; © p = 0.005, Obese III vs. all other BMI subgroups, except Underweight Допсай М., Джорджевич-Никич М.,…”