2006
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2006.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological image compositing

Abstract: Abstract-Image mosaicking can be defined as the registration of two or more images that are then combined into a single image. Once the images have been registered to a common coordinate system, the problem amounts to the definition of a selection rule to output a unique value for all those pixels that are present in more than one image. This process is known as image compositing. In this paper, we propose a compositing procedure based on mathematical morphology and its marker-controlled segmentation paradigm.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seam penalties are widely used in other computer vision applications such as stereo matching (Boykov et al 2001) to give the labeling function its coherence or smoothness. An alternative approach, which places seams along strong consistent edges in overlapping images using a watershed computation has recently been developed by Soille (2006). The sum of the two objective functions is often called the Markov Random Field (MRF) energy, since it arises as the negative log-likelihood of an MRF distribution (Geman and Geman 1984).…”
Section: ))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seam penalties are widely used in other computer vision applications such as stereo matching (Boykov et al 2001) to give the labeling function its coherence or smoothness. An alternative approach, which places seams along strong consistent edges in overlapping images using a watershed computation has recently been developed by Soille (2006). The sum of the two objective functions is often called the Markov Random Field (MRF) energy, since it arises as the negative log-likelihood of an MRF distribution (Geman and Geman 1984).…”
Section: ))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the difference only reflects changes in a single pixel without neighborhood information, image gradient difference [16,17] and normal cross-correlation [18,19] were selected as measurements in succeeding research. Moreover, in some approaches, image edges [2], salient features [20] and distance to nadir points [20,21] are also considered for seamline optimization. As regards the least-cost path searching algorithms, path optimization methods based on Dijkstra's algorithm are commonly used [10,[22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In remote sensing, this technique is applied to different datasets, including satellite [1][2][3], aerial [4][5][6][7], low-altitude [8,9] and close-range [10,11] images. In a typical processing pipeline, aerial images are always reprojected onto a digital terrain model (DTM) with various camera locations and orientations, and the obtained digital orthophoto maps (DOMs) are used for mosaicking [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different approach proposed by Reuter et al [10] creates seam lines along landscape features such as waterways or roads to merge nonoverlapping patches of DEMs with minimum geometric discontinuities. Such seam lines can be automatically identified by morphological image compositing [13], frequently used for mosaicking satellite imagery, but rarely used for DEM mosaicking due to the complexity of the method and possible lack of suitable landscape features for the seam line. Achieving seamless transitions is also crucial when filling missing data in DEMs with a DEM from different source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%