2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological features of smile attractiveness and related factors influence perception and gingival aesthetic parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
19
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(75 reference statements)
1
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mahn, E. et al and other authors [10,[33][34]40], allege that the marginal gingiva should have a maximum height of 2 mm. However, Melo, M. et al together with other authors [21,29,31,33] indicate that the teeth are exposed together with approximately 1 mm of gingival tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Mahn, E. et al and other authors [10,[33][34]40], allege that the marginal gingiva should have a maximum height of 2 mm. However, Melo, M. et al together with other authors [21,29,31,33] indicate that the teeth are exposed together with approximately 1 mm of gingival tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The perception of beauty is subjective and depends on personal experience, the media [33], ethnicity [31,[34][35], culture [33][34][35], age [31,33,36], sex, or level of education [33,36]. However, according to Pham, T. & Nguyen P. [34], as well as Khan, M. et al [35] 31,35,37,38] the most frequent smile line is the average; followed by low and high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations