Assessment of Mammalian Embryo Quality 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0343-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Evaluation of Embryos in Domestic Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been recently shown that stereomicroscopic evaluation of porcine blastocysts is correlated with ultrastructural alterations and cell death (Cuello et al 2007). This observation, along with previous observations that blastocysts with greater total cell numbers often result in higher pregnancy and birth rates than those with lower total cell numbers (Merton 2002), suggests that our grade 1 blastocysts were of better quality than our grade 3 blastocysts (because the former contained more cells than the latter), and that bOF treatment stimulated cleavage and the production of blastocysts with higher number of cells than in the control group for grade 3 and 4 blastocysts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It has been recently shown that stereomicroscopic evaluation of porcine blastocysts is correlated with ultrastructural alterations and cell death (Cuello et al 2007). This observation, along with previous observations that blastocysts with greater total cell numbers often result in higher pregnancy and birth rates than those with lower total cell numbers (Merton 2002), suggests that our grade 1 blastocysts were of better quality than our grade 3 blastocysts (because the former contained more cells than the latter), and that bOF treatment stimulated cleavage and the production of blastocysts with higher number of cells than in the control group for grade 3 and 4 blastocysts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In vitro ‐produced embryo quality is the cumulative effect of so many factors, which can roughly be classified as genetic and environmental (culture) factors. So far, morphological classifications (Gordon 1994; Mertons 2002) were used to judge embryo quality. As a result, previous work in our laboratory has showed low cell number (91.6 ± 13.75), and morphological irregularities for bad‐quality blastocyst compared with good‐quality (106 ± 12.76) ones (Kesseler et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro ‐produced bovine pre‐implantation embryos were categorized into three groups (Good, Fair and Poor) at each stage of development considered in this study, based on the International Embryo Transfer Society criteria (Merton 2002) as: Grade I (Good): Symmetrical and spherical embryo mass with individual blastomeres that are uniform in size, colour and density and have at least 85% of the cellular material remains intact; Grade II (Fair): At least 50% of the cellular material should be an intact, viable embryonic mass; moderate irregularities in overall shape of the embryonic mass, size, colour and density of individual cells, ≤ 25% of fragmentation. Grade III (Poor): Major irregularities in shape, size, colour and density; At least 25% of the cellular material should be an intact, viable embryonic mass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%