Morphological differentiation in the widespread fish Galaxias maculatus: do darker environments imply bigger eyes?

Rojo, Javier Hernán; Rodríguez, Patricia; Boy, Claudia Clementina

doi:10.1007/s10750-020-04278-y

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, eye diameter did differ between the pond types, albeit in the opposite direction to that predicted. We expected larvae from turbid ponds to compensate for reduced visibility with larger eyes (Rojo et al, 2020). Instead, larvae from transparent ponds had larger eyes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Larval newts from turbid and transparent waterbodies exhibit different morphological and behavioural traits

Zamora‐Camacho,

Aragón

2023

Freshwater Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Turbidity represents an obstacle to visual acuity underwater that might entail considerable consequences for multiple faunal traits. Morphology, especially eye size, could be adjusted to cope with reduced visibility in turbid water. Moreover, turbidity could interfere with colour signals or crypsis. Turbid water may simultaneously impair the ability of prey and predators to detect each other, which may cause reduced speed, flight initiation distance, activity time, boldness, and exploratory behaviour by prey. In this work, we compared these traits in larvae of the newt Pleurodeles waltl from transparent and turbid ponds (around 100 and 300 FTU, respectively). Body size did not differ between pond types, but larvae from turbid ponds had smaller eyes, probably because visual acuity is structurally hindered by the environment. Colouration did not differ between transparent and turbid ponds on average, but it was more variable in larvae from transparent than turbid ponds, probably because transparent ponds trigger crypsis towards diverse background colours, whereas turbid ponds promote reduced pigmentation in all cases. In addition, behavioural traits were gauged in larvae from both types of ponds, in tests conducted in either transparent or turbid water. Speed was unaffected by turbidity, but larvae from turbid ponds increased their flight initiation distance when tested in transparent water. In all cases, larvae from transparent ponds were more active, and bolder in transparent water, and all larvae were more exploratory when tested in transparent water (regardless of which pond type they came from). Turbidity could trigger more cautious behaviours, probably because it makes predators harder to track. Alternatively, transparent water could stimulate a more expansive use of space through improved visibility, or it might encourage a more active search for shelter. These results shed light on the role of turbidity as a promotor of morphological and behavioural variability in amphibian larvae. These ecological consequences of water turbidity can be framed in terms of energy allocation and detectability in the context of predator–prey interactions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%