2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological classification of compact and extended radio galaxies using convolutional neural networks and data augmentation techniques

Abstract: Machine learning techniques have been increasingly used in astronomical applications and have proven to successfully classify objects in image data with high accuracy. The current work uses archival data from the Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty Centimeters (FIRST) to classify radio galaxies into four classes: Fanaroff-Riley Class I (FRI), Fanaroff-Riley Class II (FRII), Bent-Tailed (BENT), and Compact (COMPT). The model presented in this work is based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). The propos… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, these ML methods have been used for morphological classifications of radio sources (e.g. Lukic et al 2018;Alger et al 2018;Wu et al 2019;Bowles et al 2020;Maslej-Krešňáková, El Bouchefry, & Butka 2021;Becker et al 2021;Brand et al 2023), but these models cannot be used for learning without precise training labels. Labelling a large training dataset is expensive, and with multi-million radio detections in future surveys, obtaining true and exact labels for a reasonably large fraction is not feasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, these ML methods have been used for morphological classifications of radio sources (e.g. Lukic et al 2018;Alger et al 2018;Wu et al 2019;Bowles et al 2020;Maslej-Krešňáková, El Bouchefry, & Butka 2021;Becker et al 2021;Brand et al 2023), but these models cannot be used for learning without precise training labels. Labelling a large training dataset is expensive, and with multi-million radio detections in future surveys, obtaining true and exact labels for a reasonably large fraction is not feasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data augmentation using flips and rotations of the training data as originally proposed in Aniyan & Thorat (2017) for radio galaxy classification is widely used to mitigate overfitting due to this lack of (labelled) data.It has been shown that a well thought out augmentation strategy is crucial to performance in the low data regime for radio galaxy classification (Maslej-Krešňáková et al 2021), and the potentially negative impact of unprincipled data augmentation, particularly in the case of Bayesian deep-learning approaches to radio galaxy classification, has been highlighted by Mohan et al (2022). Therefore we note that regardless of the learning paradigm, augmentation strategy will remain an important variable in model training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These features are then concatenated into one vector, which is then processed by fully connected layers to calculate the source parameters. This multibranched structure enhances the granularity and robustness of the network, and was inspired by the inception model introduced in Szegedy et al (2016) and used for galaxy morphology classification in Maslej-Krešňáková et al (2021). The regression network architecture is shown in figure 14 The regression network was trained for 300 epochs with a batch size of 32 using the Adam optimizer with a learning rate of 10 −4 .…”
Section: Source Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%