2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017rs006386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Characteristics of Equatorial Ionization Anomaly Crest Over Nanning Region

Abstract: Using the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) and the location of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) crest derived from GPS data observed at Nanning (22.84°N, 108.33°E, dip latitude ~ 12.14°N), China, a GPS station situated near the daytime EIA crest region, the local time, seasonal, and solar cycle variations of EIA crests from 2006 to 2015 was investigated. The TEC and the magnetic latitude (MLAT) location of EIA crest experience an ascendant and descendant process with the daytime evolution of EIA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GPS data observed at two ground‐based GPS stations, GUAN (Guangzhou) (23.19°N, 113.34°E, MLAT ~ 12.52°N) in China sector and KOUR (Kourou) (5.25°N, 52.8°W, MLAT ~ 14.65°N) in Brazilian sector, are used to derive the location of daytime EIA crest. Although it is generally agreed that the average MLAT location of northern EIA crest is usually about 15°N, it is only about 10–12°N in China sector (Mo et al, ). Since both GUAN and KOUR GPS stations are near northern EIA crest in their respective longitudinal sectors, a number of GPS satellite‐receiver observation arcs will pass through the EIA crest region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GPS data observed at two ground‐based GPS stations, GUAN (Guangzhou) (23.19°N, 113.34°E, MLAT ~ 12.52°N) in China sector and KOUR (Kourou) (5.25°N, 52.8°W, MLAT ~ 14.65°N) in Brazilian sector, are used to derive the location of daytime EIA crest. Although it is generally agreed that the average MLAT location of northern EIA crest is usually about 15°N, it is only about 10–12°N in China sector (Mo et al, ). Since both GUAN and KOUR GPS stations are near northern EIA crest in their respective longitudinal sectors, a number of GPS satellite‐receiver observation arcs will pass through the EIA crest region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al (1989) found the correlation coefficients between maximum EEJ strength and EIA crest latitude are higher than that between maximum EEJ strength and EIA crest magnitude, and they concluded that the electron density distribution is more directly affected by the E field than the peak electron density. Using the EIA crest derived from GPS data observed at China region from 2006 to 2015, we found that the correlation of the EIA location with EEJ strength is better than the EIA crest TEC with EEJ strength (Mo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics amplitude of 6-day oscillation in EEJ and hmF2 during September-October 2004 is roughly equivalent to that during April-May 2003, the amplitude of 6-day oscillation in EIA crest location during April-May 2003 is about twice as much as that during September-October 2004. The reason may be that although the EIA is formed by equatorial fountain effect, it is also influenced by other factors, such as photochemical process and trans-equatorial wind (Mo et al, 2018).…”
Section: 1029/2020ja028225mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mo XH et al (2018) studied the features of EIA crests by using the ionospheric TEC data observed from 2006 to 2015 at Nanning (22.84°N, 108.33°E). Both the value of TEC and the location of the northern EIA crest have a positive solar activity dependence and show a semi‐annual variation, larger in equinoctial months than in solstitial months.…”
Section: Ionospheric Structures and Climatologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Day‐to‐day variations of the location of the northern EIA crest and the strength of EEJ from 2006 to 2015. After MO X et al (2018). …”
Section: Ionospheric Structures and Climatologymentioning
confidence: 99%