2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological changes of the floodplain reach of the Taro River (Northern Italy) in the last two centuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have documented this new and recent phase of channel widening along several Italian rivers just from the 1990s onwards [21,24,25,29,30,42,43]. However, the triggering factors of this phase are still quite debated; moreover, a high uncertainty regarding its diffusion and the combination between active-channel widening and channel incision, aggradation or bed stability still exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Numerous studies have documented this new and recent phase of channel widening along several Italian rivers just from the 1990s onwards [21,24,25,29,30,42,43]. However, the triggering factors of this phase are still quite debated; moreover, a high uncertainty regarding its diffusion and the combination between active-channel widening and channel incision, aggradation or bed stability still exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, aiming to precisely define the ongoing morphological dynamics, the most suited time span to consider for analyzing the riverbed adjustments ranges from the present-day to approximately 10-25 years ago [11,22,23].Previous studies concerning the morphological evolution of Italian rivers outlined their main morphological tendencies over the last two centuries, that is substantially before the occurrence of the most intense and widespread anthropic interventions on fluvial systems. As reported by several authors [18,[24][25][26][27][28], three evolutionary phases can be recognized: (i) the first one, from the last decades of the 19th century to the 1950s, is generally characterized by gentle narrowing and incision albeit, in some cases, no large-scale dominant processes are recognizable up to the beginning of the 20th century [18]; (ii) the second one, from the 1950s to the 1990s, presents the most relevant channel adjustments related to fast, severe and generalized narrowing and incision processes, coupled with a reduction in braiding degree and with an increase of sinuosity; (iii) the third one, from the 1990s onwards, shows a reversal trend since it is characterized by active-channel widening and by an overall slight aggradation or bed-level stability; however, this latter phase is documented only along some rivers [25,29,30].The causes behind the 20th century channel changes are now widely documented [18,21] and have been recognized in the reduction of the sediment budget due to in-channel quarrying activity [19,31], occupation of areas of fluvial pertinence [21,32], channelization [19,33,34], land-use changes at catchment scale [16,30,[35][36][37][38] and building of cross works such as weirs and dams [39][40][41]. On the contrary, the triggering factors of the most recent phase are still quite debated in the scientific literature…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Liébault and Piégay, 2002), planform (e.g. Abate et al, 2015;Clerici et al, 2015;David et al, 2016;Magliulo et al, 2016), channel and floodplain geomorphic features (e.g. Adami et al, 2016) and vegetation cover (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%