2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological awareness longitudinally predicts counting ability in Chinese kindergarteners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphology and vocabulary both explained about 9-10% of the variance in counting when included as the only predictor in a model. Although the predictive power was lower than expected, the finding is in line with previous findings of vocabulary and morphology as an underlying cognitive factor in counting (Bloom & Wynn, 1997;LeFevre et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2016). Bloom and Wynn proposed that children's early knowledge of number word meaning comes through attention to both syntactic and semantic linguistic cues, such as the word order in a sentence, the closed-class morphemes they co-occur with, and the count-mass status of the nouns they modify.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Morphology and vocabulary both explained about 9-10% of the variance in counting when included as the only predictor in a model. Although the predictive power was lower than expected, the finding is in line with previous findings of vocabulary and morphology as an underlying cognitive factor in counting (Bloom & Wynn, 1997;LeFevre et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2016). Bloom and Wynn proposed that children's early knowledge of number word meaning comes through attention to both syntactic and semantic linguistic cues, such as the word order in a sentence, the closed-class morphemes they co-occur with, and the count-mass status of the nouns they modify.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It requires detecting the root of the word and its morphological endings (Lyytinen & Lyytinen, 2004). However, although morphology predicted later counting skill, the relation between morphology and counting in Finnish was much weaker than what had been recently found in Chinese (Liu et al, 2016). The differences in morphology because of the differences in languages might have influenced the findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The structure of Chinese language, as compared with that of English, better supports the development of mathematical skills, because the 10‐base number system is transparent in Chinese and Chinese number words are brief and easy to pronounce (Siegler & Mu, ). Recently, Zhang and his colleagues carried out a series of studies to delineate the relations between metalinguistic skills and mathematics learning outcomes in young Chinese children (Liu, Lin, & Zhang, ; Zhang & Lin, , ). They found that earlier phonological awareness was predictive of later performance in counting (Liu, Lin, & Zhang, ) and written arithmetic (Zhang & Lin, , ); earlier morphological awareness predicted subsequent performance in counting (Liu, Lin, & Zhang, ) and arithmetic story problems (Zhang & Lin, ); orthographic awareness was associated with written arithmetic performance which involves written symbol decoding (Zhang & Lin, ).…”
Section: The Role Of Child‐level Characteristics In Young Chinese Chimentioning
confidence: 99%