2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Awareness and Learning to Read: A Cross-Language Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

46
643
3
96

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 614 publications
(788 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
46
643
3
96
Order By: Relevance
“…There appears to be a consensus in the literature that children demonstrate morphological awareness as assessed with metalinguistic tasks or in spontaneous productions earlier for inflections than for derivations (Adams, 1990;Carlisle, 2003;Kuo & Anderson, 2006; see Rabin & Deacon, 2008 for an exception). However, the majority of studies examining the relationship between morphological awareness and reading with young children have focused typically on inflections while those with older children have targeted derivations (see Carlisle & Nomanbhoy, 1993, Carlisle, 1995; to sample the full morphological construct, we need to include both inflections and derivations in a measure of morphological awareness.…”
Section: Development Of Morphological Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There appears to be a consensus in the literature that children demonstrate morphological awareness as assessed with metalinguistic tasks or in spontaneous productions earlier for inflections than for derivations (Adams, 1990;Carlisle, 2003;Kuo & Anderson, 2006; see Rabin & Deacon, 2008 for an exception). However, the majority of studies examining the relationship between morphological awareness and reading with young children have focused typically on inflections while those with older children have targeted derivations (see Carlisle & Nomanbhoy, 1993, Carlisle, 1995; to sample the full morphological construct, we need to include both inflections and derivations in a measure of morphological awareness.…”
Section: Development Of Morphological Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a child's learning of more complex and less phonologically transparent derivations progresses, a more explicit awareness of the morphological structure and orthography of words is required. It has been argued that the learning of such irregularities is best acquired through print exposure rather than through spoken language (Casalis & LouisAlexandre, 2000;Kuo & Anderson, 2006). It may be that complex morphological representations, and an understanding of many derivations only become fully specified through exposure to the written form (Templeton & Scarborough-Franks, 1985) as morphemes are more consistently spelled than they are pronounced (e.g., Bowers & Kirby, 2010).…”
Section: Do We See a Significant Change In Ma From Kindergarten To Grmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intrinsic relationship between morphological awareness and vocabulary exists (Spencer et al, 2015). Therefore, controlling for the variance of performance on a vocabulary measure would remove a substantial portion of the expected relationship between reading and morphological awareness (Kuo & Anderson, 2006). Therefore, to reduce such a loss, this study was limited to the degree in which variance in vocabulary could be controlled for within our predictive models.…”
Section: Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of research suggests that morphological awareness is related to reading comprehension as well as the subskills that underlie reading (e.g., Carlisle, 2000;Carlisle & Stone, 2003;Fowler & Liberman, 1995;Hogan et al, 2011;Kuo & Anderson, 2006;Tong, Deacon, Kirby, Cain, & Parrila, 2011). Mahony, Singson, and Mann (2000), for instance, found independent contributions of morphological awareness to decoding in elementary school children.…”
Section: Subtest 3: Morphological Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%