2021
DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.77.59852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and molecular identification of Diaporthe species in south-western China, with description of eight new species

Abstract: Diaporthe species have often been reported as plant pathogens, endophytes and saprophytes, commonly isolated from a wide range of infected plant hosts. In the present study, twenty strains obtained from leaf spots of twelve host plants in Yunnan Province of China were isolated. Based on a combination of morphology, culture characteristics and multilocus sequence analysis of the rDNA internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF), β-tubulin (TUB), calmodulin (CAL), and histone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic analyses were conducted based on a combined DNA sequence matrix of five loci ( ITS , cal , his3 , tef1 and tub2 ) reported as useful markers to distinguish species of Diaporthe ( Udayanga et al 2014 , 2015 ; Guarnaccia et al 2017, 2018a, 2018b ; Tibpromma et al 2018 ; Yang et al 2020 ; Dissanayake et al 2020 ; Huang et al 2021 ; Sun et al 2021 , Wang et al 2021 ). The two novel species in this study can be distinguished from the other known species by all genes studied, but most effectively by cal , his3 , tef1 and tub2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phylogenetic analyses were conducted based on a combined DNA sequence matrix of five loci ( ITS , cal , his3 , tef1 and tub2 ) reported as useful markers to distinguish species of Diaporthe ( Udayanga et al 2014 , 2015 ; Guarnaccia et al 2017, 2018a, 2018b ; Tibpromma et al 2018 ; Yang et al 2020 ; Dissanayake et al 2020 ; Huang et al 2021 ; Sun et al 2021 , Wang et al 2021 ). The two novel species in this study can be distinguished from the other known species by all genes studied, but most effectively by cal , his3 , tef1 and tub2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the amplified nucleotide sequences was checked and the sequences assembled using SeqMan v.7.1.0. Reference sequences were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information ( NCBI ), based on recent publications on the genus Diaporthe (Dissanayake et al 2021; Gao et al 2021 ; Huang et al 2021 ; Sun et al 2021 , Wang et al 2021 ; Yang et al 2021 ). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT v. 6 ( Katoh and Toh 2010 ) and corrected manually using MEGA 7.0.21.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diaporthe Nitschke, and its asexual Phomopsis-like morph have been often described as plant pathogens, saprobes, and endophytes in a wide range of plant hosts [10,[12][13][14][15][16][17]. For many years, their identification has been based on morphological features and host-plant associations [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, their identification has been based on morphological features and host-plant associations [12]. Recently, multi-locus DNA data analysis combined with morphological characterization and host associations has been employed for species delimitation in the genus [13,15,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Although several endophytic Diaporthe species have been described as endophytes on woody plants worldwide [3,20,[30][31][32][33][34][35], there is no available information concerning endophytic Diaporthe on Prunus domestica in Poland or worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, molecular data have been adopted to resolve the circumscription of species of Diaporthe, initially relying on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the ribosomal DNA region (Santos et al 2009; Thompson et al 2011), and recently on multiple loci including ITS, translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF), ß-tubulin (TUB), histone (HIS), and calmodulin (CAL) gene regions (Santos et al 2017). At present, the five-locus dataset (ITS-TEF-CAL-HIS-TUB) has been optimally adopted for the species delimitation by recent authors (Gao et al 2017;Yang et al 2018Yang et al , 2020Crous et al 2020;Guo et al 2020;Hyde et al 2020;Sun et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%