“…Because of the enormous diversity of ciliates, only a few selected taxa from several groups were examined in terms of their ITS2 secondary structure. For instance, the heterotrichean genera Spirostomum Ehrenberg, 1833 (Shazib et al, 2016), and Condylostoma Bory de St. Vincent, 1824 (Chen et al, 2020); the pathogenic Balantidium coli Malmsten, 1857(Ponce-Gordo et al, 2011, as well as a number of free-living litostomateans (Rajter & Vďačný, 2017;Vďačný et al, 2012); the armophorean intestinal symbiont Nyctotheroides grimmi (Li et al, 2020) and variety of clevelandellids (Pecina & Vďačný, 2021); the oxytrichid Stylonychia lemnae Steinbruck & Schlegel, 1983(Coleman, 2005, the tinntinid Helicostomella subulata (Ehrenberg, 1833) Jörgensen, 1924 (Xu et al, 2012), various urostylid (Chen et al, 2021) and oligotrich (Li et al, 2013) spirotricheans; and oligohymenophoreans represented by 12 sessilids (Sun et al, 2010) and two mobilid (Rataj & Vďačný, 2021) genera, 16 astome species inhabiting the digestive tube of earthworms , a relatively diverse assemblage of scuticociliates (Gao et al, 2012(Gao et al, , 2013Miao et al, 2008) and, finally, two widely used model organisms, the peniculid Paramecium Müller, 1773, and the hymenostome Tetrahymena, with putative models proposed for P. tetraurelia (Ehrenberg, 1838) and T. tropicalis Nanney & McCoy, 1976(Coleman, 2005. The ITS2 secondary structures helped reliably distinguish most of the ciliate species studied but failed to discriminate distinct Spirostomum (Shazib et al, 2016(Shazib et al, , 2019, Trichodina (Rataj & Vďačný, 2021), and clevelandellid (Pecina & Vďačný, 2021) species.…”