2022
DOI: 10.1017/s0022149x21000778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and genetic variability of the cryptic Gyrodactylus sphinx and Gyrodactylus gerasevi n. sp. (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea) from the Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea: two new members of the cross-ocean distributed Gyrodactylus orecchiae species group

Abstract: Gyrodactylus sphinx Dmitrieva & Gerasev, 2000 is the only species of Gyrodactylus originally described from Aidablennius sphynx (Valenciennes) in the Black Sea. In the present study, monogeneans similar to G. sphinx are reported from the same host and from two other species of Blenniidae from the Black Sea, as well as from the Mediterranean Sea. This study aims to verify the taxonomic status of the specimens found in different hosts and localities, other than the type ones of G. sphinx. Twenty-two measurem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this group, the morphological features used for species description are related almost exclusively to the shape, size, and proportions of several haptoral structures [ 59 ]. Considering the high species richness of Gyrodactylus [ 2 ], non-significant morphological variations are expected, these causing insoluble confusions in species distinction [ 26 ]. DNA segments such as the ITS regions and, to a lesser degree, the 18S rDNA have been shown to be successful markers for revealing new species, and for assessing intraspecific variability [ 18 , 76 , 110 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this group, the morphological features used for species description are related almost exclusively to the shape, size, and proportions of several haptoral structures [ 59 ]. Considering the high species richness of Gyrodactylus [ 2 ], non-significant morphological variations are expected, these causing insoluble confusions in species distinction [ 26 ]. DNA segments such as the ITS regions and, to a lesser degree, the 18S rDNA have been shown to be successful markers for revealing new species, and for assessing intraspecific variability [ 18 , 76 , 110 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malmberg’s “species-group” concept was for a long time regarded as the miracle approach for separating species, but this view was later challenged when genetic data recovered the G. wageneri group as paraphyletic [ 9 ], while morphology and host preference suggested monophyly [ 3 ]. In addition, sclerotized haptoral features in Gyrodactylus (anchors, transverse bars and marginal hooks) may vary ecophenotypically depending on parasite age, season, geographic distribution, location on host, and host species (see, for instance, [ 25 , 26 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%