Abstract:PurposeThe aims of this study are to compare optical coherence tomography (OCT)-measured macular retinal layers in eyes with permanent temporal hemianopia from chiasmal compression and control eyes; to compare regular and slow-flash multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) in patients and controls; and to assess the correlation between OCT, mfERG, and central visual field (SAP) data.MethodsForty-three eyes of 30 patients with permanent temporal hemianopia due to pituitary tumors who were previously submitted to … Show more
“…Another study involving 43 eyes with permanent hemianopsia also reported thinning of RNFL, GCL and IPL in all regions similar to our study (de Araujo et al. ). In our study, the thickness of RNFL, GCL, IPL and IRL decreased in patients with chiasmal compression compared with the control group at 1 year postoperatively, consistent with previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…; de Araujo et al. ). These studies also revealed inner nuclear layer (INL) thickening (Monteiro et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…; de Araujo et al. ). The INL thickening involves development of INL microcysts in the area of ganglional loss as retrograde trans‐synaptic degeneration (Vanburen ; Jindahra et al.…”
Purpose: To compare postoperative macular thickness measurements of inner and outer retinal layers in eyes of patients with chiasmal compression with or without visual field (VF) recovery and healthy controls using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: Macular spectral-domain OCT has been used for the auto-segmentation of images obtained from 100 eyes affected with chiasmal compression compared with 100 healthy controls enrolled in this study. We have divided eyes with chiasmal compression into two groups: group 1 characterized by VF recovery after tumour excision and group 2 showing partial or no recovery of VF. The thickness of the macular retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), photoreceptor layer (PRL), inner retinal layer (IRL) and outer retinal layer (ORL) was segmented. The correlation between macular RNFL (mRNFL) and functional parameters has been analysed. Results: Both groups 1 and 2 showed significant thinning of RNFL, GCL, IPL and IRL in all quadrants. However, no significant changes have been detected in PRL and ORL of patients in either group compared with healthy controls. A significant thickening was detected in INL and ONL of group 2 compared with healthy controls and group 1. Postoperative mRNFL thickness is significantly correlated with VF defects and visual acuity except temporal quadrant. Conclusions: Eyes with chiasmal compression showed thinning of the inner retinal layers with thickening of the INL and ONL in patients with partial to no recovery of VF. The changes in retinal microstructures are well-correlated with functional recovery. Further studies are needed to reveal the clinical implications of these findings in patients with chiasmal compression.
“…Another study involving 43 eyes with permanent hemianopsia also reported thinning of RNFL, GCL and IPL in all regions similar to our study (de Araujo et al. ). In our study, the thickness of RNFL, GCL, IPL and IRL decreased in patients with chiasmal compression compared with the control group at 1 year postoperatively, consistent with previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…; de Araujo et al. ). These studies also revealed inner nuclear layer (INL) thickening (Monteiro et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…; de Araujo et al. ). The INL thickening involves development of INL microcysts in the area of ganglional loss as retrograde trans‐synaptic degeneration (Vanburen ; Jindahra et al.…”
Purpose: To compare postoperative macular thickness measurements of inner and outer retinal layers in eyes of patients with chiasmal compression with or without visual field (VF) recovery and healthy controls using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: Macular spectral-domain OCT has been used for the auto-segmentation of images obtained from 100 eyes affected with chiasmal compression compared with 100 healthy controls enrolled in this study. We have divided eyes with chiasmal compression into two groups: group 1 characterized by VF recovery after tumour excision and group 2 showing partial or no recovery of VF. The thickness of the macular retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), photoreceptor layer (PRL), inner retinal layer (IRL) and outer retinal layer (ORL) was segmented. The correlation between macular RNFL (mRNFL) and functional parameters has been analysed. Results: Both groups 1 and 2 showed significant thinning of RNFL, GCL, IPL and IRL in all quadrants. However, no significant changes have been detected in PRL and ORL of patients in either group compared with healthy controls. A significant thickening was detected in INL and ONL of group 2 compared with healthy controls and group 1. Postoperative mRNFL thickness is significantly correlated with VF defects and visual acuity except temporal quadrant. Conclusions: Eyes with chiasmal compression showed thinning of the inner retinal layers with thickening of the INL and ONL in patients with partial to no recovery of VF. The changes in retinal microstructures are well-correlated with functional recovery. Further studies are needed to reveal the clinical implications of these findings in patients with chiasmal compression.
“…• With multifocal visual-evoked potentials, it can be used to analyse mfERG, mfVEP or mfPERG 8,9,10,13,17,20,25,28,34,37,42,45,49,52,53,54,55 0:5125 0:5328 0:5438…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study [6] concludes that using the central ring in mfERGs is an appropriately sensitive technique with which to study the progression of age-related macular degeneration over short periods of time. Analysis by quadrant makes it possible to carry out comparisons between mfERG studies and optical coherence tomography (OCT) [7,8]. It is also common to find the results of clustering by ring and quadrant in publications that analyse the technical aspects of mfERG [9,10].…”
Purpose To propose a new method of identifying clusters in multifocal electrophysiology (multifocal electroretinogram: mfERG; multifocal visual-evoked potential: mfVEP) that conserve the maximum capacity to discriminate between patients and control subjects. Methods The theoretical framework proposed creates arbitrary N-size clusters of sectors. The capacity to discriminate between patients and control subjects is assessed by analysing the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). As proof of concept, the method is validated using mfERG recordings taken from both eyes of control subjects (n = 6) and from patients with multiple sclerosis (n = 15).
ResultsConsidering the amplitude of wave P1 as the analysis parameter, the maximum value of AUC = 0.7042 is obtained with N = 9 sectors. Taking into account the AUC of the amplitudes and latencies of waves N1 and P1, the maximum value of the AUC = 0.6917 with N = 8 clustered sectors. The greatest discriminant capacity is obtained by analysing the latency of wave P1: AUC = 0.8854 with a cluster of N = 12 sectors. Conclusion This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of a method able to determine the arbitrary clustering of multifocal responses that possesses the greatest capacity to discriminate between control subjects and patients when applied to the visual field of mfERG or mfVEP recordings. The method may prove helpful in diagnosing any disease that is
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.