2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00536.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Adaptation Influences the Evolution of a Mating Signal

Abstract: Theory predicts that forces of natural selection can reduce the intensity of sexually selected traits. In this study, I investigate how morphological adaptation to feeding ecology influences a mating signal. In birds, changes in feeding ecology can cause rapid divergence in bill morphology. Because bills are also important for song production, feeding ecology may influence song divergence. During song, birds can rapidly change vocal tract resonance using bill movement, yet are constrained in rate and magnitude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The vocal tract itself is also involved in dampening harmonic overtones by rapid changes in the oropharyngeal cavity (Riede et al 2006), and bill movements may be important only in the production of frequencies produced above 4 kHz (Nelson et al 2005;Riede et al 2006). In the population of swamp sparrows that I studied, the average high frequency produced is about 7.7 kHz (Ballentine 2006a); thus, bill movements at least partly constrain song production in swamp sparrows (Westneat et al 1993;Hoese et al 2000). While the specific model for how constraints on the production of rapid, broadband trills presented here may be incomplete, the production of rapid, broadband trills is nevertheless physically limited, and vocal performance provides a framework for how song can be an accurate indicator of male quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vocal tract itself is also involved in dampening harmonic overtones by rapid changes in the oropharyngeal cavity (Riede et al 2006), and bill movements may be important only in the production of frequencies produced above 4 kHz (Nelson et al 2005;Riede et al 2006). In the population of swamp sparrows that I studied, the average high frequency produced is about 7.7 kHz (Ballentine 2006a); thus, bill movements at least partly constrain song production in swamp sparrows (Westneat et al 1993;Hoese et al 2000). While the specific model for how constraints on the production of rapid, broadband trills presented here may be incomplete, the production of rapid, broadband trills is nevertheless physically limited, and vocal performance provides a framework for how song can be an accurate indicator of male quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method for quantifying vocal performance is described in detail elsewhere (Podos 2001;Ballentine et al 2004;Ballentine 2006a). Briefly, I plotted trill rate (X axis) and frequency bandwidth (Y axis) of songs, then calculated an upper boundary regression, which estimates the performance limit on trill production (Podos 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some distinctions among the three subspecies' songs have already been noted (Mowbray 1997), and Ballentine (2006) has compared song traits between M. g. nigrescens and georgiana. Despite these reports, there has been no study coupling a description of song with an experimental test of vocal discrimination in these two subspecies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These two characteristics are inversely related to each other due to the physical constraints that prevent maximal vocal performance in both traits (Podos 1997, 2001, Podos and Nowicki 2004, Ballentine et al 2004, Ballentine 2006. They are also ideal characteristics to examine because they measure concrete quantitative traits of vocal performance with which different song types can be compared.…”
Section: Song Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of research highlights the links between morphological variation and song variation, suggesting that divergence in morphological traits that have ecological significance (e.g. bill morphology) may also influence song divergence (Palacios & Tubaro, 2000;Podos, 2001;Ballentine, 2006;Huber & Podos, 2006). While bird song is produced when air passes over the syrinx causing vibration of the tympaniform membranes; the size, shape, and movements of the vocal tract play a significant role in filtering harmonic overtones resulting in the characteristic pure tone sound of birdsong (Nowicki, 1987;Westneat et al, 1993;Beckers et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%