“…Since 2014, new findings from in vitro , ex vivo and in situ studies using micro‐computed tomographic (micro‐CT) imaging technology reshaped the overall panorama and understanding on the development of dentinal defects produced by root canal preparation and filling procedures (Aggarwal et al, 2021; Aksoy et al, 2019; Alkahtany & Al‐Madi, 2020; Arashiro et al, 2020; Arumugam & Yew, 2021; Aydin et al, 2014; Bayram et al, 2017a, 2017b; Belladonna et al, 2021; Çakici et al, 2019; Cassimiro et al, 2017; Cavalcante et al, 2020; Ceyhanli et al, 2016; De‐Deus et al, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017b, 2017c, 2020; Jain et al, 2018; Jamleh et al, 2015, 2021; Mandava et al, 2018; Martins et al, 2021; Miguéns‐Vila et al, 2017; de Oliveira et al, 2017a, 2017b; Rödig et al, 2019; Shemesh et al, 2018; Stringheta et al, 2019; Vieira et al, 2020; Zuolo et al, 2017). The achievements from these studies identified that: (i) root dentinal microcracks observed in cross‐sectional images of extracted teeth are not caused by canal shaping procedures; (ii) dehydration often causes cracking of the dentinal tissue, regardless of canal instrumentation; (iii) dentinal microcracks do not predispose the root to fracture in a laboratory setting using extracted teeth; (iv) microcracks observed in root sections of extracted teeth ( in vitro ) cannot be confirmed in a fresh cadaver model ( in situ ); (v) dentinal microcracks caused by endodontic procedures and observed in cross‐sectional images of extracted roots are a phenomenon that has never been reported in clinical practice.…”