2017
DOI: 10.2108/zs160065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morpho-Molecular Evidence for Polymorphism in the Mushroom CoralCycloseris hexagonalis(Scleractinia: Fungiidae), with a New Phylogenetic Position and the Establishment of a New Genus for the Species

Abstract: Mushroom corals are reef corals of the family Fungiidae, which live in the tropical and subtropical Indo-Pacific region. Recently, most species of this family have been revised taxonomically based on morphological and molecular analyses. However, the phylogenetic position of Cycloseris hexagonalis ( Milne Edwards and Haime, 1848 ) has not been analyzed and remains unclear. This species is believed to show allometric growth by changing its corallum shape from hexagonal in juveniles to irregularly circular with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After sampling, a fragment (<1 cm3) of each specimen was preserved in CHAOS solution (4M guanidine thiocyanate, 0.1% N-lauroyl sarcosine sodium, 10mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 0.1M 2-mercaptoethanol; Fukami et al, 2004) for DNA analysis, and the remnant samples were bleached for morphological analysis. In addition, we also collected specimens of Danafungia scruposa (Klunzinger, 1879) and Halomitra pileus (Linnaeus, 1758), which are known to be closely related to F. fungites (Gittenberger et al, 2011;Oku et al, 2017), and Lobactis scutaria (Lamarck, 1801) as outgroup. All specimens were identified at species level, based on original descriptions and related references (e.g., Linnaeus, 1758;Lamarck, 1801;Klunzinger, 1879;Hoeksema, 1989).…”
Section: Sampling and Species Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After sampling, a fragment (<1 cm3) of each specimen was preserved in CHAOS solution (4M guanidine thiocyanate, 0.1% N-lauroyl sarcosine sodium, 10mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 0.1M 2-mercaptoethanol; Fukami et al, 2004) for DNA analysis, and the remnant samples were bleached for morphological analysis. In addition, we also collected specimens of Danafungia scruposa (Klunzinger, 1879) and Halomitra pileus (Linnaeus, 1758), which are known to be closely related to F. fungites (Gittenberger et al, 2011;Oku et al, 2017), and Lobactis scutaria (Lamarck, 1801) as outgroup. All specimens were identified at species level, based on original descriptions and related references (e.g., Linnaeus, 1758;Lamarck, 1801;Klunzinger, 1879;Hoeksema, 1989).…”
Section: Sampling and Species Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The barcoding portion of the mitochondrial COI, and ITS of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (including partial 18S, ITS-1, 5.8S, ITS-2, and partial 28S) were amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the primers COI mod F and R (Gittenberger et al, 2011) for COI, and primers 1S and 2SS (Wei et al, 2006) for ITS. PCR conditions described by Oku et al (2017) were used in this study. The DNA sequences were determined by direct sequencing using ABI3730 sequencers (Applied Biosystems, Alameda, California, USA).…”
Section: Molecular Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations