1988
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(88)90479-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphine-6-glucuronide: Analgesic effects and receptor binding profile in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
83
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…M6G is also more potent than morphine (146 : 1) at producing rewarding e ects measured with place preference testing following intracerebral administration (Abbott & Franklin, 1991). Binding studies show that M6G has an equal or lower a nity for the muopioid receptor than morphine (Abbott & Palmour, 1988;Chen et al, 1991;Hucks et al, 1992;Lambert et al, 1993;Mignat et al, 1995;LoÈ ser et al 1996;Brown et al, 1997b;Pan et al, 1999). In order to explain these di erences in the potencies of M6G and morphine, it has recently been hypothesized that M6G has selective antinociceptive and other behavioural agonist e ects at a receptor that is not activated by morphine (reviewed by Pasternak & Standifer, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…M6G is also more potent than morphine (146 : 1) at producing rewarding e ects measured with place preference testing following intracerebral administration (Abbott & Franklin, 1991). Binding studies show that M6G has an equal or lower a nity for the muopioid receptor than morphine (Abbott & Palmour, 1988;Chen et al, 1991;Hucks et al, 1992;Lambert et al, 1993;Mignat et al, 1995;LoÈ ser et al 1996;Brown et al, 1997b;Pan et al, 1999). In order to explain these di erences in the potencies of M6G and morphine, it has recently been hypothesized that M6G has selective antinociceptive and other behavioural agonist e ects at a receptor that is not activated by morphine (reviewed by Pasternak & Standifer, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In general, glucuronidation is thought to serve as an inactivating or protective function by terminating or attenuating the activity of many endogenous, dietary and clinically administered drugs as well as environmental chemicals that have been shown to result in toxicity or carcinogenesis [2]. However, glucuronidation also can result in the generation of bioactive or even toxic compounds, including those of estrogens, morphine, retinoids, bile acids, and heterocyclic aromatic amines [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although M3G is devoid of analgesic activity, M6G is now thought to play a major role in mediating the analgesic effect of morphine (Osborne et al, 1986;Hanks et al, 1987; Hanks, 1990). When given directly M6G has been demonstrated to have more potent antinociceptive activity than morphine in animals (Shimomura et al, 1971;Pasternak et al, 1987;Abbott & Palmour, 1988;Paul et al, 1989). It is tempting to presume the receptor binding profile of morphine and M6G is similar with M6G purely binding more avidly to the same receptors as morphine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%