2023
DOI: 10.1063/5.0131609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphed inception of dynamic Leidenfrost regime in colloidal dispersion droplets

Abstract: Droplet impact on a heated substrate is an important area of study in spray cooling applications. On substrates significantly hotter than the saturation temperature, droplets immediately hover on its vapor cushion, exhibiting the Leidenfrost phenomenon. Here, we report the phenomena wherein addition of Al2O3 nanoparticles to water significantly increases the onset of dynamic Leidenfrost temperature ( TDL) and suppresses the overall Leidenfrost regime. We experimentally revealed that the onset of TDL delays wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, no such nanoparticle deposition was noted for HPL nanofluid droplets at concentrations below 59.0 wt %, as evident in Figure a and c. Consequently, more pronounced nanoparticle deposition observed for HPO nanofluid droplets is likely one of the primary reasons for the elevated T L compared to the HPL nanofluid droplets. This increase in T L due to nanoparticle deposition is also reported by Paul et al and Prasda et al, who suggest that these deposited nanoparticles on the surface further increase the surface roughness and promote atomization by interrupting the pressure in the vapor film.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison, no such nanoparticle deposition was noted for HPL nanofluid droplets at concentrations below 59.0 wt %, as evident in Figure a and c. Consequently, more pronounced nanoparticle deposition observed for HPO nanofluid droplets is likely one of the primary reasons for the elevated T L compared to the HPL nanofluid droplets. This increase in T L due to nanoparticle deposition is also reported by Paul et al and Prasda et al, who suggest that these deposited nanoparticles on the surface further increase the surface roughness and promote atomization by interrupting the pressure in the vapor film.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Consequently, more pronounced nanoparticle deposition observed for HPO nanofluid droplets is likely one of the primary reasons for the elevated T L compared to the HPL nanofluid droplets. This increase in T L due to nanoparticle deposition is also reported by Paul et al 60 and Prasda et al, 61 who suggest that these deposited nanoparticles on the surface further increase the surface roughness and promote atomization by interrupting the pressure in the vapor film. A possible explanation for the different amounts of NP deposition between HPL and HPO nanofluid droplets is that, based on the thermodynamic energy argument, the HPO NPs are likely to be distributed on the droplet's surface, while the HPL NPs tend to distribute more uniformly throughout the bulk droplet since EG is a polar solvent.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionsupporting
confidence: 77%