2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphed emotional faces: Emotion detection and misinterpretation in social anxiety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(55 reference statements)
4
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of SA (Clark & Wells, 1995;Heimberg, Brozovich, & Rapee, 2010;Rapee & Heimberg, 1997; for a review, see Wong, Gordon, & Heimberg, 2014) predict that information processing biases play a role in the maintenance of the psychopathology. Numerous studies have supported this assumption by showing, for example, that high socially anxious (HSA) individuals tend to display an attentional bias towards external threat (e.g., Miskovic & Schmidt, 2012) and a greater likelihood of favouring the threatening meaning of ambiguous cues (Amir, Beard, & Bower, 2005;Heuer, Lange, Isaac, Rinck, & Becker, 2010). In addition to being sensitive to external threat, those individuals are also more likely to engage in the processing of internal stimuli relevant to their fear, such as bodily states, thoughts and emotions (e.g., Spurr & Stopa, 2002).…”
Section: Social Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of SA (Clark & Wells, 1995;Heimberg, Brozovich, & Rapee, 2010;Rapee & Heimberg, 1997; for a review, see Wong, Gordon, & Heimberg, 2014) predict that information processing biases play a role in the maintenance of the psychopathology. Numerous studies have supported this assumption by showing, for example, that high socially anxious (HSA) individuals tend to display an attentional bias towards external threat (e.g., Miskovic & Schmidt, 2012) and a greater likelihood of favouring the threatening meaning of ambiguous cues (Amir, Beard, & Bower, 2005;Heuer, Lange, Isaac, Rinck, & Becker, 2010). In addition to being sensitive to external threat, those individuals are also more likely to engage in the processing of internal stimuli relevant to their fear, such as bodily states, thoughts and emotions (e.g., Spurr & Stopa, 2002).…”
Section: Social Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there seem to be only few studies that have taken into β consideration, and the results have been mixed (e.g., Heuer, Lange, Isaac, Rinck, & Becker, 2010;Leppänen & Hietanen, 2004), one aspect of the present dissertation was to investigate in what manner participants are answering and whether there would be a favoring of one or more face type(s). Specifically, whereas Heuer et al (2010) found a response bias, favoring happy faces, Leppänen and Hietanen (2004) did not find any favoring happy or angry over the other. The further investigation of potential re-sponse bias is important, though, because such a bias may have increased happy-superiority effects in studies in which emotion discrimination have been measured as percent correct.…”
Section: Response Bias (β)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression recognition skills vary in the general population (Sullivan et al, 2007;Vassalo et al, 2009;Werheid et al, 2010;Tamamiy and Hiraki, 2013) and have been associated with social adjustment, mental health and workplace performance (Carton et al, 1999;Norwicky and Duke, 1994). Specific impairments in facial expression categorization have been associated with a range of neurological and psychological problems, such as amygdala lesions (Adolphs et al, 2005), autism (Baron-Cohen, 1995), schizophrenia (Edwards et al, 2002;Penn et al, 2006), social anxiety (Heuer et al, 2010) and major depression (Joormann and Gotlieb, 2006). As a result, different methodologies aimed at improving categorization of facial expressions have been developed over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that facial expression categorization skills are impaired in people with social anxiety (Heuer et al, 2010) and major depression (Joormann and Gotlieb, 2006), it may be important to investigate whether subclinical levels of depression or anxiety in a typical population could affect expression recognition skills or the potential benefit of facial expression training.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%