Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.4103/1658-631x.204854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morning blood pressure surge as a predictor of outcome in patients with essential hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we found a significant relationship between MBPS and 24-h BP and echocardiographic parameters such as LAD, E/Em, and LVMI, we detected positive correlations between MBPS and age, 24-h SBP, daytime SBP, and echocardiographic parameters as mentioned above. These findings support the findings of Abdel-Khalik et al, who reported that MBPS was positively correlated with LAD, 24-h daytime and nighttime SBP, and IVS thickness [ 35 ] and those of Kuwajima et al who found a significant positive correlation between MBPS and LVMI [ 36 ]. Likewise, Yilmaz et al found a significant correlation between MBPS and E/Em ratio as a marker of diastolic dysfunction [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, we found a significant relationship between MBPS and 24-h BP and echocardiographic parameters such as LAD, E/Em, and LVMI, we detected positive correlations between MBPS and age, 24-h SBP, daytime SBP, and echocardiographic parameters as mentioned above. These findings support the findings of Abdel-Khalik et al, who reported that MBPS was positively correlated with LAD, 24-h daytime and nighttime SBP, and IVS thickness [ 35 ] and those of Kuwajima et al who found a significant positive correlation between MBPS and LVMI [ 36 ]. Likewise, Yilmaz et al found a significant correlation between MBPS and E/Em ratio as a marker of diastolic dysfunction [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%