More Than Reflections: Empathy in Motivational Interviewing Includes Language Style Synchrony Between Therapist and Client

Abstract

Empathy is a basic psychological process that involves the development of synchrony in dyads. It is also a foundational ingredient in specific, evidence-based behavioral treatments like motivational interviewing (MI). Ratings of therapist empathy typically rely on a gestalt, “felt sense” of therapist understanding and the presence of specific verbal behaviors like reflective listening. These ratings do not provide a direct test of psychological processes like behavioral synchrony that are theorized to be an important component of empathy in psychotherapy. To explore a new objective indicator of empathy, we hypothesized that synchrony in language style (i.e., matching how statements are phrased) between client and therapists would predict gestalt ratings of empathy over and above the contribution of reflections. We analyzed 122 MI transcripts with high and low empathy ratings based on the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) global rating scale. Linguistic inquiry and word count was used to estimate language style synchrony (LSS) of adjacent client and therapist talk turns. High empathy sessions showed greater LSS across 11 language style categories compared to low empathy sessions (p < .01), and overall, average LSS was notably higher in high empathy vs. low empathy sessions (d = 0.62). Regression analyses showed that LSS was predictive of empathy ratings over and above reflection counts; a 1 SD increase in LSS is associated with 2.4 times increase in the odds of a high empathy rating, controlling for therapist reflections (odds ratio = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.36, 4.24, p < .01). These findings suggest empathy ratings are related to synchrony in language style, over and above synchrony of content as measured by therapist reflections. Novel indicators of therapist empathy may have implications for the study of MI process as well as the training of therapists.

“I feel your pain”: A critical review of organizational research on empathy

“…For example, exposing participants to photos of angry and happy faces produces automatic, spontaneous facial mirroring among participants high in trait empathy (Sonnby‐Borgström, Jonsson, & Svensson, ). Similarly, observational research and text analysis finds that people automatically mimic others' behavior (e.g., Chartrand & Bargh, ) and linguistic style (e.g., Lord, Sheng, Imel, Baer, & Atkins, ). Although the neurological network of behavioral mirroring appears to overlap with that of affective empathy, there is also evidence that behavioral mirroring is associated with greater activation in premotor areas compared with affective empathy (Carr, Iacoboni, Dubeau, Mazziotta, & Lenzi, ).…”

A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process: Technical, relational, and conditional process models of change.

“…Laws et al, 2015 [Physicians as Counselors coding system, (PaCCS)]; Lord et al, 2015 [Language Style Synchrony (LSS)]…”

She Said, She Said: Differential Interpersonal Similarities Predict Unique Linguistic Mimicry in Online Word of Mouth

“…Like behavioral mimicry, linguistic mimicry is ubiquitous and serves as a strategic "social glue" (we like those we mimic, and mimic those we like; ) that can have positive or negative consequences across a range of human interactions (Babcock et al 2014;Lord et al 2015;Kulesza, Dolinski, Huisman and Majewski 2013;Ludwig et al 2013;O'Donnell et al 2015;Rains 2015;Richardson et al 2014;Yilmaz 2015). For example, higher levels of linguistic mimicry increase romantic interest between individuals who are speed-dating (Ireland et al 2011), increase preferences for products (Tanner et al 2008), and increase team performance, trust, and cohesion (Gonzales et.…”