2019
DOI: 10.35297/qjae.010016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More Than Quibbles: Problems with the Theory and History of Fractional Reserve Free Banking

Abstract: The extensive debate over fractional reserve free banking (FRFB) has spanned decades and includes volleys from many contributors. Consequently, relative newcomers to the controversy often wish to extend the conversation on several fronts. In this spirit, Bagus and Howden (2010) is a 27-page paper detailing numerous objections to FRFB, which they modestly entitled, "Fractional Reserve Free Banking: Some Quibbles." The present paper continues in this tradition, elaborating on some of the key critiques of FRFB ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fractional reserve banking system does not only imply severe ethical and legal problem [75][76][77][78][79][80][81], it also exerts economic consequences such as redistribution [82] and recurring cycles of boom and bust. These business cycles portray the inherent instability of a fractional reserve banking system which has been analyzed extensively in the literature [83][84][85][86][87][88]. Moreover, as banks can fail (due to risky and hazardous practices), governments enforce a deposit insurance model to protect depositors with the support of central banks instead of encouraging a bail-in of bank creditors in case of bank troubles [89,90].…”
Section: Proposal Of Paradigm Change Towards a Sustainable Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fractional reserve banking system does not only imply severe ethical and legal problem [75][76][77][78][79][80][81], it also exerts economic consequences such as redistribution [82] and recurring cycles of boom and bust. These business cycles portray the inherent instability of a fractional reserve banking system which has been analyzed extensively in the literature [83][84][85][86][87][88]. Moreover, as banks can fail (due to risky and hazardous practices), governments enforce a deposit insurance model to protect depositors with the support of central banks instead of encouraging a bail-in of bank creditors in case of bank troubles [89,90].…”
Section: Proposal Of Paradigm Change Towards a Sustainable Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Robert P. Murphy too belongs to the full reserve school, he has avoided engaging the question of legality in his recent contribution (Murphy 2019) and has focused exclusively on the issue of distortions introduced by fiduciary media and fractional reserve banking. Philipp Bagus, David Howden, Walter E. Block, and Amadeus Gabriel (Bagus and Howden 2010;Bagus, Howden, and Block 2013;and Bagus, Howden, and Gabriel 2015) have entered the ranks of the full reserve school as well, arguing for the impermissibility of fractional reserve banking for involving a confusion between deposits and loans.…”
Section: The Free Banking School and The Full Reserve Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial banks can only enhance their lending capacity by taking on more deposits if specific monetary policy criteria and an increase in reserves are not met. Again, since deposits are a source of loans, banks want your funds in order to make additional loans (Murphy, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%