2011
DOI: 10.1177/0958928711412223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More than just money: Patterns of disaggregated welfare expenditure in the enlarged Europe

Abstract: Summary This article demonstrates the potential of the disaggregated expenditure approach in comparative welfare state analysis by applying it for comparing patterns of welfare spending across 28 European countries. An initial factor analysis shows that welfare states differ primarily along their emphasis either on cash transfers for the elderly or on social services and cash transfers for the working-age population. European welfare states cluster along these two spending dimensions in a way that to a great e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed the major studies in the field about the relationship between political actors and economic redistribution rely on this indicator (Jensen 2011). Although some research has taken advantage of disaggregated categories of social expenditure (Kuitto 2011), the demarcation of sub-categories of spending can create problems in cross-national comparability. In line with earlier studies, we therefore opt for a comprehensive measure of social expenditure (Huber and Stephens 2001;Swank 1988).…”
Section: Research Design and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed the major studies in the field about the relationship between political actors and economic redistribution rely on this indicator (Jensen 2011). Although some research has taken advantage of disaggregated categories of social expenditure (Kuitto 2011), the demarcation of sub-categories of spending can create problems in cross-national comparability. In line with earlier studies, we therefore opt for a comprehensive measure of social expenditure (Huber and Stephens 2001;Swank 1988).…”
Section: Research Design and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of social spending in Italy is in line with the EU average, at approximately 26 percent of GDP in 2006 (Eurostat, 2012a). Italian social spending is biased toward old age and survivor pensions that absorb more than 60 percent of the resources (Kuitto, 2011); thus, the amount that remains to finance other forms of assistance is appreciably below what is spent in other large EU economies such as France, Germany, or the U.K.…”
Section: Social Transfers In Italymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is par-ticularly true in contemporary Romania, where household resources are scant due to increasing vulnerabilities in the labour market (Stă nculescu and Marin 2011), a minimalistic or emergent welfare state (Cerami 2008;Kuitto 2011), little community support and widespread social distrust (Voicu 2010;Mueller 2011). Bearing in mind these structural features of Romanian society, the fourth section of the paper discusses the various risks of slipping into poverty by four representative cases according to their household type, further suggesting labelling this category as 'precarious decency' due to lack of strong evidences for strategies of achieving prosperity.…”
Section: Comparative Research On Precarious Prosperitymentioning
confidence: 99%