2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2012.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More than hello: Reconstituting sociolinguistic subjectivities in introductions among American Stuttering English speakers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Danilyn Rutherford (2021) has shown how stretching ideas about communication has created the conditions to care for her disabled daughter, relying on carers’ accepting full‐body communication as a collaborative process. In Nathaniel Dumas's (2012) research on stuttering communities, he shows how impediments to typical forms of speech inspire community members to create the conditions for communication, which requires attention to the needs of communicators, such as additional time for speech acts and patience in their audiences. Across this work, it becomes evident that language as self‐expression is only part of the dynamics of interpretation; the ways that community and kin collaborate in making interactions meaningful encompass far more communicative competence than “just” spoken language.…”
Section: A Capacity‐based Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Danilyn Rutherford (2021) has shown how stretching ideas about communication has created the conditions to care for her disabled daughter, relying on carers’ accepting full‐body communication as a collaborative process. In Nathaniel Dumas's (2012) research on stuttering communities, he shows how impediments to typical forms of speech inspire community members to create the conditions for communication, which requires attention to the needs of communicators, such as additional time for speech acts and patience in their audiences. Across this work, it becomes evident that language as self‐expression is only part of the dynamics of interpretation; the ways that community and kin collaborate in making interactions meaningful encompass far more communicative competence than “just” spoken language.…”
Section: A Capacity‐based Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASE is defined in Dumas (2012:217) as a variety of English that uses multiple partial reduplication (Ghomeshi, Jackendoff, Rosen, & Russell 2004) in plain versus expressive morphology (Zwicky & Pullum 1987), a process known in vernacular discourse as ‘stuttering’ 1 . I assume Landar's (1961) position of stuttering as normal sociolinguistic variation and distinct from self-initiated self-repair (Schegloff, Jefferson, & Sacks 1977) in everyday conversation (see Dumas 2011).…”
Section: The Varieties Under Comedic Examination: American Stutteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other work, Hilary Dick's () review of “language and migration to the United States” discusses how people (including migrants) are categorized and ranked through linguistic practices and ideologies. In addition, Nathaniel Dumas's () study of introductions in a community of stutterers reinterprets conversational openings as embodied encounters between language ideologies. Such a standpoint allows him to understand the ways that pathology can be constructed or challenged through the minute details of everyday interactions, thus depathologizing stuttering.…”
Section: Expansions and Refinementsmentioning
confidence: 99%