1983
DOI: 10.1016/0097-3165(83)90013-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More on the Erdös-Ko-Rado theorem for integer sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, c k s s ; p k 0 ), then the following result holds. (Theorem 2 also generalizes earlier results of Berge [2], Bollobás and Leader [3], and others (see [5][6][7][8][9]14]). )…”
Section: Theorem 1 (See Holroyd Spencer and Talbotsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…, c k s s ; p k 0 ), then the following result holds. (Theorem 2 also generalizes earlier results of Berge [2], Bollobás and Leader [3], and others (see [5][6][7][8][9]14]). )…”
Section: Theorem 1 (See Holroyd Spencer and Talbotsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This generalises a well-known result that was first stated by Meyer [31] and proved in different ways by Deza and Frankl [10], Bollobás and Leader [4], Engel [11] and Erdős et al [12], and that can be described by saying that the conjecture is true for F = [n] r . Berge [3] and Livingston [30] had proved (i) and (ii) respectively for the special case F = {[n]} (other proofs are found in [18,32]). In [5] the conjecture is also verified for F uniform and EKR; Holroyd and Talbot [20] had essentially proved (i) for such a family F in a graph-theoretical context.…”
Section: Intersecting Families Of Signed Setsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are several other papers in the general area, for example [1][2][3]7,[10][11][12]14,[16][17][18]24,27].…”
Section: Theorem 13 (See Deza and Franklmentioning
confidence: 98%