2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04166-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More confident, less formal: stylistic changes in academic psychology writing from 1970 to 2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative interpretation is that the pattern reflects stylistic changes in psychology writing, perhaps specific to abstracts, in which more expressive language has become acceptable, desirable, or expected. For instance, Wheeler et al ( 2021 ) demonstrated a rise in informal writing within academic psychology abstracts. Although this second interpretation runs counter to the decreased use of emotionally toned words found in psychology textbooks by Sell and Farreras ( 2017 ), it may be consistent with the increased use of both positive and negative words in the scientific abstracts from 1970 to 2014 documented by Vinkers et al ( 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative interpretation is that the pattern reflects stylistic changes in psychology writing, perhaps specific to abstracts, in which more expressive language has become acceptable, desirable, or expected. For instance, Wheeler et al ( 2021 ) demonstrated a rise in informal writing within academic psychology abstracts. Although this second interpretation runs counter to the decreased use of emotionally toned words found in psychology textbooks by Sell and Farreras ( 2017 ), it may be consistent with the increased use of both positive and negative words in the scientific abstracts from 1970 to 2014 documented by Vinkers et al ( 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although the abstracts provide dense and standardized summaries of psychological research, they may not be the ideal medium for assessing the overall positivity or focus of that research. Abstracts combine neutral reporting on concepts, findings, and methods with an advertising function, and their stylistic aspects, and requirements may distort the assessment of their content focus (Wheeler et al, 2021 ). A more comprehensive assessment might employ full article texts, although this is prohibitively difficult due to copyright restrictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). A vast amount of literature has confirmed the increase in the use of first‐person pronouns, which are often a natural choice for the syntactic structure of these texts, in several science fields (Wheeler et al, 2021). A scientific article usually describes an experiment, or a series of experiments conducted by the authors, and the use of first personal pronouns can be traced back to the first examples of scientific journal in the 17th century (Kronick, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the abstract and the acknowledgments corpora are presented in Table 1. All texts were analyzed using LIWC Version 2015 because it has shown validity in processing various academic text genres, such as journal abstracts and grant proposals (Hartley, Pennebaker & Fox, 2003;Markowitz, 2019;Wheeler et al, 2021). As indicated in the introduction, we analyzed four main LIWC categories, including analytical thinking, tone, dictionary words, and social words.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computerized text analysis programs, such as Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC; Pennebaker et al, 2015), offer an alternative approach to examining the writing style of academic texts (e.g., Tieken–Boon van Ostade, 2013, 2020; Wheeler et al, 2021). The working mechanism of LIWC is that it calculates the percentage of words in a text that corresponds to meaningful linguistic, social, and psychological categories in the LIWC dictionary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%