More bodily motor action, less visual attention: How supermarket stimuli and consumer-related factors influence gaze behavior

Ladeira, Wagner Júnior; Dalmoro, Marlon; Santini, Fernando de Oliveira; Ruffatto, Juliane; Zanoni, R.

doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102403

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, a little is known about what happens in reading, especially attention to task-related information. Attention to task-related information has been defined as the result and reflection of user brain cognition (Marvin and Chun, 2000;Franceschini et al, 2012;Maturi and Sheridan, 2020;Ladeira et al, 2021). It involves several aspects including visual attention, auditory attention and so on.…”

Section: Literature Review 21 Attention To Task-related Information S...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cognitive differences between readers attentive and inattentive to task-related information: an eye-tracking study

Chen

Zhang

Qian

2022

AJIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeAttentive to task-related information is the prerequisite for task completion. Comparing the cognition between attentive readers (AR) and inattentive readers (IAR) is of great value for improving reading services which has seldom been studied. To explore their cognitive differences, this study investigates the effectiveness, efficiency and cognitive resource allocation strategy by eye-tracking technology.Design/methodology/approachA controlled user study of two types of task, fact-finding (FF) and content understanding (CU) tasks was conducted to collect data including answer for task, fixation duration (FD), fixation count (FC), fixation duration proportion (FDP), and fixation count proportion (FCP). 24 participants were placed into AR or IAR group according to their fixation duration on paragraphs related to task.FindingsTwo types of cognitive resource allocation strategies, question-oriented (QO) and navigation-assistant (NA) were identified according to the differences in FDP and FCP. In FF task, although QO strategy was applied by the two groups, AR group was significantly more effective and efficient. In CU task, although the two groups were similar in effectiveness and efficiency, AR group promoted their strategies to NA while IAR group sticked to applying QO strategy. Furthermore, an interesting phenomenon “win by uncertainty”, which implies IAR group may get correct answer through uncertain means, such as clue, domain knowledge or guess, rather than task-related information, was observed.Originality/valueThis study takes a deep insight into cognition from the prospect of attentive and inattentive to task-related information. Identifying indicators about cognition helps to distinguish attentive and inattentive readers in various tasks automatically. The cognitive resource allocation strategy applied by readers sheds new light on reading skill training. A typical reading phenomenon “win by uncertainty” was found and defined. Understanding the phenomenon is of great value for satisfying reader information need and enhancing their deep learning.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review 21 Attention To Task-related Information S...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Attention to task-related information has been defined as the result and reflection of user brain cognition (Marvin and Chun, 2000; Franceschini et al. , 2012; Maturi and Sheridan, 2020; Ladeira et al. , 2021).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%