2013
DOI: 10.1177/0891243213484510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More and Less than Equal

Abstract: In both social science and medicine, research on reproduction generally focuses on women. In this article, we examine how men’s reproductive contributions are understood. We develop an analytic framework that brings together Cynthia Daniels’ conceptualization of reproductive masculinity (2006) with a staged view of reproduction, where the stages include the period before conception, conception, gestation, and birth. Drawing on data from two medical sites that are oriented to the period before pregnancy (precon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In both of these cases, part of the reason the patient was saddled with this non-physical fertility work owed to the structural fact that contraceptive counseling visits in the U.S. do not typically include men (although, in some countries, vasectomy counseling visits do include female partners; Moses & Oloto, 2008). The lack of partner participation implicitly underscores and normalizes women’s non-physical fertility work and points to the overall dearth of engagement with men around issues of reproduction (Almeling & Waggoner, 2013). These encounters functioned to convey and construct the mental and emotional burdens of fertility work as normal and appropriately accruing to women, even when the contraceptive method worked in a male body.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both of these cases, part of the reason the patient was saddled with this non-physical fertility work owed to the structural fact that contraceptive counseling visits in the U.S. do not typically include men (although, in some countries, vasectomy counseling visits do include female partners; Moses & Oloto, 2008). The lack of partner participation implicitly underscores and normalizes women’s non-physical fertility work and points to the overall dearth of engagement with men around issues of reproduction (Almeling & Waggoner, 2013). These encounters functioned to convey and construct the mental and emotional burdens of fertility work as normal and appropriately accruing to women, even when the contraceptive method worked in a male body.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results substantiate the need to include men in PCC. Although not always acknowledged, men play a vital role in planning pregnancies with their partners and in having positive birth outcomes (38,49,50).…”
Section: Effects Of Substance Use On Reproductive Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This more inclusive definition would impact other groups of men who have concerns about their fertility, such as cancer patients. In using Daniels’ (2006) concept of “reproductive masculinity” and expanding it to include men who are not currently thought of as “reproducers” (Almeling & Waggoner, 2013), these findings illuminate the willingness of infertile and potentially infertile men to engage in discussions surrounding fertility. Thus, men must be brought back into the discussion of reproductive health at multiple time-points in their lives, as this discussion may not pose as much of a threat to their masculinity as previously thought.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%