Morbidity in laparoscopic gynecological surgery

Cordick, C. Mac; Lécuru, Fabrice; Rizk, E.; Robin, F.; Boucaya, Valérie; Taurelle, R

doi:10.1007/s004649900898

Cited by 62 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…About half of the complications occurred during the installation of the laparoscopic procedure. The authors extolled the virtues of adherence to safety rules to reduce the incidence of unwanted side-effects [13].…”

Section: Gynecology Laparoscopic Complicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Standards for Gynecologic Surgery

O'Dowd

2013

J Obstet Gynecol India

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are significant problems to consider when we reflect on ''Standards for Gynecologic Surgery.'' Surely most professional standards are already in place, or are they? Are standards already available, locally, nationally, or internationally? Where those standards are not already available will it be possible set new standards for the multiplicity of operative interventions, performed by an array of trainees, specialists, and colleagues many of whom are outside of our remit and spread over the continents? If we do set standards how do we audit outcomes to gynecologic surgery and insure that the standards are being complied with? How do we tutor our trainees effectively and also insure that established specialists retain their skill base, are up-to-date, and compliant with continuing medical education? It is important to realize that the success or failure of a modern surgical investigation or procedure will now be judged not on the pure surgical outcome alone, but will also need to reflect patient focus through excellence in the areas of communication, patient information, informed consent and confidentiality. The accessibility to services, appropriate environment, and processes being offered by trained and competent staff members-who are supervised when required-should all be included in audits of outcomes set against agreed auditable standards.

show abstract

Section: Gynecology Laparoscopic Complicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Standards for Gynecologic Surgery

O'Dowd

2013

J Obstet Gynecol India

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cela nous rappelle les facteurs de risque de survenue des complications qui sont les antécé-dents de laparotomie, le type de chirurgie, l'expérience du chirurgien et l'obésité [2,14,17,18]. Les cinq patientes avec plaie digestive rapportées par Krebs [19] avaient toutes un antécédent de laparotomie, ce qui permet d'affirmer que les tests de sécurité doivent être systématiques, bien que leur efficacité soit modérée [4]. C'est la raison pour laquelle d'autres auteurs proposent l'open laparoscopy qui aussi ne semble pas plus efficace selon une étude de Vilos et al [20].…”

Section: Résultatsunclassified

“…Ces résultats se rapprochent de ceux de certains auteurs [2,8] [4,21]. Il s'agit surtout des coeliochirurgies avancées dans la plupart de ces séries, ce qui rend la comparaison difficile avec notre étude.…”

Section: Résultatsunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Les complications de la cœliochirurgie dans le service de gynécologie A de l’hôpital général de Yaoundé, Cameroun

Nguefack

Mboudou²,

Tejiokem

et al. 2009

Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproducti

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This leads to the need to include human error in the assessment of the security of a system, for a realistic assessment of the risk to be made (8). The concept of human error can be defined as an action that exceeds a certain limit of acceptability and is in most cases the result of the unpredictability of human behavior.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%