2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-013-9937-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morbidity and mortality after massive transfusion in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Abstract: Background Massive transfusion is associated with high morbidity and mortality, yet existing reports of massive transfusion are limited. Our primary aim was to determine the incidence of complications and 30-day mortality among patients who received massive transfusions and to explore risk factors associated with 30-day mortality.Methods We evaluated 971,455 patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. We assessed the associations between 30-day… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(37 reference statements)
3
44
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the majority (15%) of intraoperative complications in the OPEN group were excessive blood loss (> 4 L), which has a questionable impact on short-and long-term outcomes. 34 The HYB group's rate of complications fell between the MIS and OPEN groups. A lack of power due to the small cohort is probably why the majority of significant differences were not found between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the majority (15%) of intraoperative complications in the OPEN group were excessive blood loss (> 4 L), which has a questionable impact on short-and long-term outcomes. 34 The HYB group's rate of complications fell between the MIS and OPEN groups. A lack of power due to the small cohort is probably why the majority of significant differences were not found between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…None of these intuitive statements is especially surprising, even to the most inexperienced anesthesiologist. Indeed, in this issue of the Journal, Turan et al 1 describe an extensive retrospective cohort study that encompasses almost one million patients and addresses these very issues, thus confirming much of our intuition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Güncel çalışmalar travma hastalarının %25'inde kan transfüzyonu gerektiğini ve bunların da %2-3'ünün masif transfüzyon aldığını göstermektedir (3) . Masif kan transfüzyonu son derece acil bir durum olup, masif transfüzyon sayesinde zamanında tanı ve uygun yönetim ile masif kan kaybı olan hastalarda başarı-lı sonuçlar alınmaktadır (4) . Masif transfüzyon için güncel medikal literatürde farklı zaman dilimleri için farklı tanımlamalar mevcuttur: -Kişinin total kan hacmi kadar kanın 24 saat içinde transfüzyonu, -Yirmi dört saat içinde 10 ünite veya daha fazla eritrosit süspansiyonunun transfüzyonu, -Dört saat içinde 5 ünite veya daha fazla eritrosit süspansiyonunun transfüzyonu, -Kişinin kan hacminin yarısından fazlasının 3 saat içinde transfüzyonu, -Dört saat içinde herhangi bir 60 dk.…”
Section: Masif Transfüzyon Ne Demektir Ve Hangi Durumlarda Yapılmalıdır?unclassified