2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00230-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morbid obesity and the prone position: a case report

Abstract: Case ReportA 37-year-old, 193 kg, 173 cm tall [body mass index (BMI) Ͼ 65 kg/m 2 ] woman was scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Her past medical history was significant for hypothyroidism controlled with thyroid supplements, nephrolithiasis, urinary tract infections, and osteoarthritis. There was no history of obstructive sleep apnea.Preoperative physical examination revealed a Mallampati Class II view of the oropharynx, full range of motion of her head and neck, a thyromental distance of Ͼ5 finger … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anaesthesiologists experienced with obese patients and prone positioning are preferred. Reduced lung functional residual capacity and total lung capacity, as well as reduced venous return from inferior vena cava compression may occur with prone obese patients . We acknowledge that supine positioning has been suggested to have possible advantages for obese patients over prone positioning, including shorter operating times ; however this must be balanced with the loss of nephroscope manoeuvrability associated with supine PCNL, which can be troublesome in super obese patients, as nephroscope mobility is already greatly hampered by patient anatomy .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anaesthesiologists experienced with obese patients and prone positioning are preferred. Reduced lung functional residual capacity and total lung capacity, as well as reduced venous return from inferior vena cava compression may occur with prone obese patients . We acknowledge that supine positioning has been suggested to have possible advantages for obese patients over prone positioning, including shorter operating times ; however this must be balanced with the loss of nephroscope manoeuvrability associated with supine PCNL, which can be troublesome in super obese patients, as nephroscope mobility is already greatly hampered by patient anatomy .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients in the LA group were fully conscious during the operation, and were thus able to position themselves comfortably and quickly. Patients undergoing surgical procedures in the prone position under general anaesthesia may experience an increased incidence of a variety of complications [9, 10, 25–27]. The incidence of such complications may be substantially decreased if the patient is awake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the complications that may result from general anaesthesia, the performance of the operation in the prone position provides further opportunities for patient morbidity that include decreased pulmonary compliance, cardiovascular instability and airway problems [9–12]. Different anaesthetic techniques have been introduced as an alternative to general anaesthesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, cardiac venous return is diminished by compression onto the inferior vena cava and femoral veins, which in turn leads to decreased volume in the left ventricle, causing hypotension. Prone position in obese patients under anesthesia improves pulmonary functions and increase FRC, pulmonary compliance, and oxygenation [53,67].…”
Section: Intraoperative Management 31 Positioning In Morbidly Obesementioning
confidence: 99%