Forgotten Times and Spaces: New Perspectives in Paleoanthropological, Paleoetnological and Archeological Studies. 2015
DOI: 10.5817/cz.muni.m210-7781-2015-28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moravia between Gravettian and Magdalenian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Processes of abandonment or unsuccessful colonization were given less attention in the context of Late Glacial biogeography, but they are equally important because they reflect limits and constraints on human adaptation [ 3 ]. A growing body of evidence shows that Central Europe was not completely abandoned during the LGM [ 6 , 13 , 118 , 119 ]. Human populations were certainly reduced, but they were still possibly present throughout the Pleniglacial [ 23 , 120 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Processes of abandonment or unsuccessful colonization were given less attention in the context of Late Glacial biogeography, but they are equally important because they reflect limits and constraints on human adaptation [ 3 ]. A growing body of evidence shows that Central Europe was not completely abandoned during the LGM [ 6 , 13 , 118 , 119 ]. Human populations were certainly reduced, but they were still possibly present throughout the Pleniglacial [ 23 , 120 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human populations were certainly reduced, but they were still possibly present throughout the Pleniglacial [ 23 , 120 ]. New findings from eastern Central Europe point to a possible existence of at least seasonally occupied areas with a milder environment [ 118 , 121 , 122 ] where some vertebrate species survived, possibly attracting human hunters. This indicates the importance of local microclimatic conditions [ 118 ] and suggests that the processes taking place in eastern Central Europe were not necessarily the same as in the more extensively studied western part of Central Europe [ 3 , 123 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BP (Neruda, 2010; Ne-ruda et al, 2009). Despite the generally adopted awareness of the decolonisation of the climatically exposed regions of Central Europe in the LGM and the following period that preceded the Magdalenian colonisation, in recent years, we applied ourselves to the study of an archaeological site, the occupation of which falls within the period, when the LGM petered out, and the LGT that followed, on the grounds of 14 C dating (Nerudová and Ne-ruda, 2015). The evidence of the local more favourable conditions can be documented not only by palaeorecords in vegetation but also by archaeological evidence.…”
Section: Archaeological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some areas of Central Europe were largely abandoned by human groups during the LGM (c. 24,000 to 19,000 BP, Hughes et al 2015 ), human presence, associated with the Epigravettian, appears to have persisted in Moravia at least intermittently (Nerudová and Neruda 2015 ; Nerudová et al 2016 ). As such, the post-LGM expansion of the Magdalenian (c. 17,000 to 15,000 BP) may not have been into an unoccupied landscape, as it was in other regions (Nerudová 2010 ; Maier 2015 ; Nerudová and Neruda 2015 , Maier et al 2020 ). Magdalenian presence in Moravia has been broadly correlated with cold, periglacial climates associated with the Last Glacial Termination (GS-2.1a), although a mosaic of habitats existed in the region (Nerudová et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%