2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3710813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morals in Multi-unit Markets

Abstract: We examine how the erosion of morals in markets depends on the market power of individual traders. Previously studied single-unit markets provide market power to individual traders by limiting the roles of two forces: (i) the replacement logic, whereby immoral trading is justified by the belief that others would trade otherwise; (ii) market selection, by which the least moral trader determines quantities. In an experiment, we compare single-unit to (more common) multi-unit markets which may activate these forc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies show that some people lie only partially or do not lie at all, because they have an intrinsic cost of lying (a self-image cost) and/or because they do not want to be perceived as liars by others or themselves (image concerns). Another stream of research shows that moral behavior can be eroded in market interactions and voting (see, for instance, Falk and Szech, 2013 ; Bartling et al, 2015 , Falk et al, 2020 ; Ziegler et al, 2020 ), and that the psychological cost of immoral behavior can be reduced by choosing to be ignorant about the consequences of one's, actions on others (see Dana et al, 2007 ; Exley, 2015 ; Grossman and van der Weele, 2017 ; Serra-Garcia and Szech, 2021 ).…”
Section: Research On Moral Behavior In Behavioral Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies show that some people lie only partially or do not lie at all, because they have an intrinsic cost of lying (a self-image cost) and/or because they do not want to be perceived as liars by others or themselves (image concerns). Another stream of research shows that moral behavior can be eroded in market interactions and voting (see, for instance, Falk and Szech, 2013 ; Bartling et al, 2015 , Falk et al, 2020 ; Ziegler et al, 2020 ), and that the psychological cost of immoral behavior can be reduced by choosing to be ignorant about the consequences of one's, actions on others (see Dana et al, 2007 ; Exley, 2015 ; Grossman and van der Weele, 2017 ; Serra-Garcia and Szech, 2021 ).…”
Section: Research On Moral Behavior In Behavioral Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 A related argument is the potential crowding out of intrinsic or moral motivation within market settings (e.g., Frey and Oberholzer-Gee, 1997;Deci et al, 1999;Frey and Jegen, 2001;Bènabou and Tirole, 2003;Bolle and Otto, 2010;Cappelen et al, 2017). A large literature discusses whether the market erodes moral values (see, e.g., Sandel 2012;Falk and Szech, 2013;Bruni and Sugden, 2013;Storr and Choi, 2019;Ziegler et al, 2020;Bartling et al, 2021), yet does not give an unambiguous answer. Further, markets may induce tradeoffs between benefits from trade and moral/ideal standards (e.g., Brekke et al, 2003;Eyckmans and Kverndokk, 2010).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 A related argument is the potential crowding out of intrinsic or moral motivation within market settings (e.g., Frey and Oberholzer-Gee, 1997;Deci et al, 1999;Frey and Jegen, 2001;Bènabou and Tirole, 2003;Bolle and Otto, 2010;Cappelen et al, 2017). A large literature discusses whether the market erodes moral values (see, e.g., Sandel 2012;Falk and Szech, 2013;Bruni and Sugden, 2013;Storr and Choi, 2019;Ziegler et al, 2020;Bartling et al, 2021), yet does not give an unambiguous answer. Further, markets may induce tradeoffs between benefits from trade and moral/ideal standards (e.g., Brekke et al, 2003;Eyckmans and Kverndokk, 2010).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%