Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice

Cropanzano, Russell; Byrne, Zinta S.; Bobocel, D. Ramona; Rupp, Deborah E.

doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791

Cited by 1,112 publications

(1,133 citation statements)

References 158 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,018

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We do so by adopting a broad definition of status: lay people's own constructions of the general concept of status. Although several definitions and operationalizations of status have been used in the literature (Cropanzano et al, 2001;Lind, 2001; press), we argue here that these definitions have a lot in common at a broad level: All definitions of status have to do with the regard and approval that people receive from others. As a result, focusing people on their own constructions of the general concept of status should provide a good starting point to study the psychology of procedural fairness effects.…”

Section: The Present Researchmentioning

confidence: 93%

Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.

Prooijen¹,

Bos²,

Wilke³

2002

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

125

135

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current article explores status as an antecedent of procedural fairness effects (the findings that perceived procedural fairness affects people's reactions, e.g., their relational judgments). On the basis of the literature, the authors proposed that salience of the general concept of status leads people to be more attentive to procedural fairness information and that, as a consequence, stronger procedural fairness effects should be found. In correspondence with this hypothesis, Experiment 1 showed stronger procedural fairness effects on people's relational treatment evaluations in a status salient condition compared with a control condition. Experiment 2 replicated this effect and, in further correspondence with the hypothesis, showed that status salience led to increased cognitive accessibility of fairness concerns. Implications for the psychology of procedural justice are discussed.

show abstract

Section: The Present Researchmentioning

confidence: 93%

Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.

Prooijen¹,

Bos²,

Wilke³

2002

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

125

135

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The perception of fair/ unfair treatment by teachers is a critical but understudied factor that may influence students' moral development. A desire for fair treatment from authority can be understood from an instrumental perspective (Leventhal 1980): perceiving that one's own opinion is heard gives control over one's life, fostering higher levels of control and belonging (Cropanzano et al 2001). When people feel that they are treated fairly, they also tend to consider authority as more trustworthy (Tyler and Smith 1999).…”

Section: Perceived Teacher Fairness/unfairnessmentioning

confidence: 99%

How School can Teach Civic Engagement Besides Civic Education: The Role of Democratic School Climate

Lenzi

Vieno

Sharkey

et al. 2014

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Civic engagement, defined as involvement in community life, is influenced by reciprocal relationships between individuals and contexts and is a key factor that contributes to positive youth development. The present study evaluates a theoretical model linking perceived democratic school climate with adolescent civic engagement (operationalized as civic responsibility and intentions for future participation), taking into account the mediating role of civic discussions and perceived fairness at school. Participants were 403 adolescents (47.9 % male) ranging in age from 11 to 15 years old (mean age = 13.6). Path analysis results partially validated the proposed theoretical model. Higher levels of democratic school climate were associated with higher levels of adolescent civic responsibility; the association was fully mediated by civic discussions and perceived fairness at school. Adolescents' civic responsibility, then, was positively associated with a stronger intention to participate in the civic domain in the future.

show abstract

“…Although procedural fairness is commonly defined as originating from (an authority within) the organization, the multifoci justice model of Cropanzano, Byrne, Bobocel, and Rupp (2001) emphasizes the presence of multiple sources of (un)fairness, especially in terms of interpersonal treatment, at the level of the organization, supervisor, co-workers or, important in this context, customers (e.g., Rupp & Spencer, 2006;Spencer & Rupp, 2009). Indeed, Rupp and colleagues demonstrated that employees perceive customers as a potential source of unfairness, which influences employees' adherence to organizational guidelines regarding emotional display rules (i.e., emotional labor).…”

Section: Intergroup Contact and Work-related Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interracial public–police contact: Relationships with police officers’ racial and work-related attitudes and behavior

Dhont

Cornelis

Hiel

2010

International Journal of Intercultural Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a sample of Flemish police officers (N = 172), we examined whether interracial public-police contact is associated with police officers' racial and workrelated attitudes and self-reported behavior. Complementing previous studies, it was revealed that interracial contact (both positive and negative) is related to prejudiced behavior toward immigrants via the mediating role of racial attitudes. Moreover, intergroup contact was also shown to be related to police officers' organizational citizenship behavior toward colleagues and superiors via their perceptions of organizational fairness. In the discussion section we elaborate on the severe impact of negative contact as well as the applied consequences of our findings within police organizations.

show abstract

Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice

Cited by 1,112 publications

References 158 publications

Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.

Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.

How School can Teach Civic Engagement Besides Civic Education: The Role of Democratic School Climate

Interracial public–police contact: Relationships with police officers’ racial and work-related attitudes and behavior

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About