“…So, we do not seem to be in a world of no commitment. Meanwhile, the average effect of leasing on investment does not change appreciably after accounting for tenancy duration, remaining strongly significant in both rows (6) and (7).…”
Section: The Tenure Security Effectmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, adverse selection may arise when a component of plot fertility is private information to the landowner, in which case less fertile plots would tend to be leased out rather than owner-cultivated. Second, moral hazard on the part of the tenant would have a similar effect if more fertile plots are more sensitive to soil degradation (see Dubois, 2002, for a tenancy model along these lines). Endogeneity bias induced by the correlation between L ci and ∆ε c can be tackled using instrumental variables.…”
Section: Basic Specification and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use instrumental variables to address this endogeneity problem; in particular, using information on the owner of each cultivated plot, which we have even if the plot is leased. 7 The next section of the paper provides the context for our study and sets out a simple two-period model of tenancy, moral hazard, and land-specific investment. Section 3 describes the estimation strategy, develops the identification argument, and provides evidence on the determinants of tenancy duration.…”
When contracts are incomplete, relationship specific investments may be underprovided due to the threat of opportunism or 'holdup'. This paper finds evidence of a holdup problem in rural Pakistan. Land specific investment is lower on leased plots than on owned plots cultivated by the same household, even after correcting for the effects of adverse selection in the leasing market. Greater security of tenure is also found to increase investment on leased plots. Differences in tenure security appear to be largely driven by heterogeneity across landlords in their willingness to commit to long-term relationships, suggesting that some landlords value reputation more than others. These findings have implications for both land and tenancy reform.
“…So, we do not seem to be in a world of no commitment. Meanwhile, the average effect of leasing on investment does not change appreciably after accounting for tenancy duration, remaining strongly significant in both rows (6) and (7).…”
Section: The Tenure Security Effectmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, adverse selection may arise when a component of plot fertility is private information to the landowner, in which case less fertile plots would tend to be leased out rather than owner-cultivated. Second, moral hazard on the part of the tenant would have a similar effect if more fertile plots are more sensitive to soil degradation (see Dubois, 2002, for a tenancy model along these lines). Endogeneity bias induced by the correlation between L ci and ∆ε c can be tackled using instrumental variables.…”
Section: Basic Specification and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use instrumental variables to address this endogeneity problem; in particular, using information on the owner of each cultivated plot, which we have even if the plot is leased. 7 The next section of the paper provides the context for our study and sets out a simple two-period model of tenancy, moral hazard, and land-specific investment. Section 3 describes the estimation strategy, develops the identification argument, and provides evidence on the determinants of tenancy duration.…”
When contracts are incomplete, relationship specific investments may be underprovided due to the threat of opportunism or 'holdup'. This paper finds evidence of a holdup problem in rural Pakistan. Land specific investment is lower on leased plots than on owned plots cultivated by the same household, even after correcting for the effects of adverse selection in the leasing market. Greater security of tenure is also found to increase investment on leased plots. Differences in tenure security appear to be largely driven by heterogeneity across landlords in their willingness to commit to long-term relationships, suggesting that some landlords value reputation more than others. These findings have implications for both land and tenancy reform.
“…The share contract can emerge as a solution to balance the tenant's effort supply and risk choice. Dubois (2002) considers the role of land fertility in the determination of the optimal contract. The contractual choice depends on the trade-off between the possibility of the land overuse and its fertility.…”
Abstract:Th e paper provides a new explanation for the emergence of sharecropping in agriculture. Under the principal--agent moral hazard framework, the choice of the agrarian land lease contracts is discussed from the perspective of behavioural economics. Th e analyses show that the landlord and the tenant's behaviour patterns play an important role during the course of the contractual choice. Specifi cally, the combination of altruism and moral hazard can lead to sharecropping, which gives an explanation greatly diff erent from the existing theoretical literature.
“…The second direction centres on self-selection effects, which holds that sharecropping results from the adverse selection problem (Hallagan 1978;Allen 1982). The third direction concentrates on moral hazard, which stresses that sharecropping is a relatively effective measure to deal with the opportunistic problem on the part of the landlord or the tenant or both of them (Eswaran and Kotwal 1985;Laffont and Matoussi 1995;Agrawal 1999;Ghatak and Pandey 2000;Dubois 2002). The fourth direction puts emphasis on the role of limited liability in determining the existence of sharecropping (Basu 1992;Sengupta 1997;Ray and Singh 2001;Dam and Perez 2012).…”
Abstract:Th e paper provides a new explanation for the existence of sharecropping in agriculture from the perspective of organizational economics. Similar to a multinational enterprise's decision of whether to enter a joint venture or to choose a wholly owned subsidiary, we can see sharecropping as a joint venture and a fi xed rent contract as a wholly owned subsidiary when we stand in the tenant's position. Our analysis shows that when the landlord has a strong enough comparative advantage in exerting one type of eff ort, he/she tends to choose the share contract.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.