2014
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2281.12076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral economies and the cold chain

Abstract: In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the spread of what we now know as the cold chain sparked controversy in both Europe and North America. This article examines popular distrust of early refrigerated transport and storage in light of larger debates about how best to procure good food at a fair price. Expanding on E. P. Thompson's concept of moral economy, the article shows that refrigeration proved controversial not simply because it helped de-localize and industrialize food supply. It also c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not only a matter of understanding different 'levels' of influence, or of detailing ordered chains of action: instead, DuPuis' method is to represent and describe the circulation and conjunction of interconnected flows of materials, knowledges and discourse (Leslie and Reimer, 1999). This approach is consistent with the suggestion that fridge freezers simultaneously figure as instruments of household provisioning (Shove et al, 2012;Shove and Pantzar, 2005), and also as essential features of changing systems of provision (Freidberg, 2015).…”
Section: What Are Fridge Freezers For?mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This is not only a matter of understanding different 'levels' of influence, or of detailing ordered chains of action: instead, DuPuis' method is to represent and describe the circulation and conjunction of interconnected flows of materials, knowledges and discourse (Leslie and Reimer, 1999). This approach is consistent with the suggestion that fridge freezers simultaneously figure as instruments of household provisioning (Shove et al, 2012;Shove and Pantzar, 2005), and also as essential features of changing systems of provision (Freidberg, 2015).…”
Section: What Are Fridge Freezers For?mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In turn this highlights the multiplicity of ways in which people-place connections may manifest as material relations and practices. It must be remembered that these connections include non-humans, and so these moral economies are also informed by ideas about the treatment of nature and nonhumans (Freidberg 2014), including animals, plants, chemicals, machinery, buildings and soils. Agency and adaptive capacity are key elements in building social resilience Ross 2013, Maleksaeidi andKarami 2013), which also depends on the development of strong social networks (Maclean, Cuthill et al 2014).…”
Section: Placing Social Resilience: Enchantment and Ethical Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Ritzer (2011) the standardisation and industrialisation of mainstream, modern agriculture precludes the possibilities of enchantment that these very ground-level accounts allow for; technologies change the distance between farm and mouth (Freidberg 2014), and farm and farmer, making relations with food and the environment more opaque. Holloway et al (2014: 189) argue that 'a technology frames the world: it becomes a means of disclosing the world to use and of making it available in particular ways…reducing the world to a set of resources and cutting us off from other relationships with it'.…”
Section: Enchanting Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paalawalis are women labourers performing paala.4 For another expansion on the concept of moral economy and contestation around norms around transparency, naturalness and freshness of perishable commodities and their trade, seeFreidberg (2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%