“…To be sure, this amplification is necessary and welcome, but something of the power religions claim is lost when religious leaders mistake conforming to existing global health practices for the more difficult task of articulating and enacting theo-ethical commitments capable of transforming the practices, themselves. To borrow from Christian ethicist James Gustafson's analysis of the varieties of forms of moral discourse in medicine, global health policy, and practices that fail to account for ethical critiques, including theo-ethical critiques, -easily degenerate into satisfaction with the merely possible, with assumed values and procedures, with the domination of the economic or institutional considerations.‖ 47 Religious entities -or, better, the -right‖ religious entitieshave been invited to the global health table, but it remains unclear whether they sit at the table as equals or as subordinates. The evidence offered above suggests that the movement toward religion as an ally in the response to HIV is taking place largely on terms set by the secular global health community.…”