1990
DOI: 10.1093/jmp/15.2.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral Discourse About Medicine: A Variety of Forms

Abstract: Moral evaluations of medical research and care focus on different issues, e.g., clinical choices, public policy and cultural values. Technical ethical concepts and arguments do not suffice for all issues. Analysis of the literature suggests that, in addition to ethical discourse, prophetic, narrative, and policy discourse function morally. The article characterizes each of these forms, and suggests the insufficiency of each if it is taken to be the only mode of analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dramatic rehearsal is similar to what Gustafson (1990) once termed the "prophetic discourse" in ethics. 13 Gustafson distinguishes two varieties: the apocalyptic and the utopian.…”
Section: Dramatic Rehearsalmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Dramatic rehearsal is similar to what Gustafson (1990) once termed the "prophetic discourse" in ethics. 13 Gustafson distinguishes two varieties: the apocalyptic and the utopian.…”
Section: Dramatic Rehearsalmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Bioethics, as first described by Beauchamp and Childress (1989), involved the application of four basic principles: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence and justice. Thus, bioethics was ‘the framing of problems and solutions by a relatively small set of concepts: rights, duties, obligations, competence, and justice’ (Gustafson 1990, p. 127). Fry (1989) drew a distinction between nursing and medical ethics, suggesting that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be sure, this amplification is necessary and welcome, but something of the power religions claim is lost when religious leaders mistake conforming to existing global health practices for the more difficult task of articulating and enacting theo-ethical commitments capable of transforming the practices, themselves. To borrow from Christian ethicist James Gustafson's analysis of the varieties of forms of moral discourse in medicine, global health policy, and practices that fail to account for ethical critiques, including theo-ethical critiques, -easily degenerate into satisfaction with the merely possible, with assumed values and procedures, with the domination of the economic or institutional considerations.‖ 47 Religious entities -or, better, the -right‖ religious entitieshave been invited to the global health table, but it remains unclear whether they sit at the table as equals or as subordinates. The evidence offered above suggests that the movement toward religion as an ally in the response to HIV is taking place largely on terms set by the secular global health community.…”
Section: Religious Health Assets: a Critical Appreciationmentioning
confidence: 99%