Moral concerns are differentially observable in language

Abstract

Language is a psychologically rich medium for human expression and communication.While language usage has been shown to be a window into various aspects of people's social worlds, including their personality traits and everyday environment, its correspondence to people's moral concerns has yet to be considered. Here, we examine the relationship between language usage and the moral concerns of Care, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority, and Purity as conceptualized by Moral Foundations Theory. We collected Facebook status updates (N = 107,798) from English-speaking participants (n = 2,691) along with their responses on the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Overall, results suggested that self-reported moral concerns may be traced in language usage, though the magnitude of this effect varied considerably among moral concerns. Across a diverse selection of Natural Language Processing methods, Fairness concerns were consistently least correlated with language usage whereas Purity concerns were found to be the most traceable. In exploratory follow-up analyses, each moral concern was found to be differentially related to distinct patterns of relational, emotional, and social language. Our results are the first to relate individual differences in moral concerns to language usage, and to uncover the signatures of moral concerns in language.

Using moral foundations in government communication to reduce vaccine hesitancy

“…This means that RIVM has never used words or sentences that relate to fairness, justice and trustworthiness. An example of such a sentence would be: “This brochure contains fair and unprejudiced information about vaccinations.” Kennedy et al [ 48 ] investigate the relationship between language usage and the five MFT dimensions by analysing Facebook status updates. Also in their study, Fairness/Cheating was the most difficult dimension to trace in language.…”

Welcome to the Real World: Escaping the Sociology of Culture and Cognition

“…There is also a much more robust connection between socially produced language and psychological traits than M&L's skeptical take suggests. It is possible, for example, to predict a person's responses on morality questionnaires on the basis of the language they naturally produce (see e.g., Kennedy et al 2021).…”

Changing channels? A comparison of Fox and MSNBC in 2012, 2016, and 2020

“…Subtle messaging including "dog-whistles," aimed at resonating with their intended audiences, are likely to carry positive rewards for each network. An extensive empirical track record suggests that LIWC is wellsuited for assessing many of these subtle speech patterns (Boyd & Schwartz, 2021), and that it can outperform narrowly tailored dictionaries such as the MFD-2 (Kennedy et al, 2021).…”

“…Further, our invocation of natural language analysis relied largely on the simple, brute-force technique of word-counting rather than more computationally intensive approaches such as word embeddings, which represent words in a high-dimensional space and, in their recent incarnations, are sensitive to the sequence of words in a document as well. Techniques such as these are likely to provide a richer understanding of the nature and impact of Fox News and MSNBC (Kennedy et al, 2021).…”