Moral Competence, Moral Teamwork and Moral Action – The European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes (Euro-MCD) Instrument 2.0 and its revision process

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p><jats:italic>Background</jats:italic> Clinical Ethics Support (CES) services are offered to support healthcare professionals in dealing with ethically difficult situations. Evaluation of CES is important to understand if it is indeed a supportive service in order to inform and improve future implementation of CES. Yet, methods to measure outcomes of CES are scarce. In 2014, the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes Instrument (Euro-MCD) was developed to measure outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation (MCD). To further validate the instrument, we tested it in field studies and revised it. This paper presents the Euro-MCD 2.0 and describes the revision process. <jats:italic>Methods</jats:italic> The revision process comprised an iterative dialogue among the authors as Euro-MCD-project team, including empirical findings from six Euro-MCD field-studies and input from European experts in CES and theory. Empirical findings contained perceptions and experiences of MCD outcomes among healthcare professionals who participated in MCDs in various settings in Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands. Theoretical viewpoints on CES, literature on goals of CES and MCD and ethics theory guided the interpretation of the empirical findings and final selection of MCD outcomes.<jats:italic>Results</jats:italic> The Euro-MCD 2.0 Instrument includes three domains: Moral Competence, Moral Teamwork and Moral Action. Moral Competence consists of items about moral sensitivity, analytical skills and virtuous attitude. Moral Teamwork includes open dialogue and supportive relationships and Moral Action refers to moral decision-making and responsible care. During the revision process, we made decisions about adding and reformulating items as well as decreasing the number from 26 to 15 items. We also altered the sentence structure of items to assess the current status of outcomes (e.g. ‘now’) instead of an assumed improvement over time (e.g. ‘better’) and we omitted the question about perceived importance.<jats:italic>Conclusions</jats:italic>: The Euro-MCD 2.0 is shorter, less complex and more strongly substantiated by an integration of empirical findings, theoretical reflections and dialogues with participants and experts. Use of the Euro-MCD 2.0 will facilitate evaluation of MCD and can thereby monitor and foster implementation and quality of MCD. The Euro-MCD 2.0 will strengthen future research on evaluation of outcomes of MCD.</jats:p>

Ethik-Fortbildungen als Element der Klinischen Ethikarbeit: Ein Überblick über Formate und weitere strukturierende Elemente

“…Bei der Gestaltung einer effektiven Schulungsmaßnahme müssen demnach eine Vielzahl von strukturellen und didaktischen Aspekten berücksichtigt werden. Darüber hinaus findet Ethikbildung oftmals auch außerhalb von Fortbildungen statt: So bewirken Ethik-Fallberatungen und die Entwicklung von Ethik-Leitlinien in vielen Fällen einen Zugewinn an ethischer Kompetenz bei den Beteiligten (Riedel 2016;de Snoo-Trimp et al 2020). In dem Bewusstsein, dass alle Säulen klinischer Ethikarbeit damit das Potenzial zur Generierung von Fortbildungseffekten besitzen und ineinandergreifen (vgl.…”