2019
DOI: 10.1111/phin.12235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral Character and the Significance of Action: Judging Dmitri Karamazov

Abstract: The paper considers the problematic relation between a person and her action as it is expressed in the problem of blame and moral judgement. I argue that blaming someone for her action does affect our moral judgement of her, but does not imply condemnation of her moral character. I use the example of Dmitri Karamazov to show that a response to a particular situation, although shaped by the previous character of the person, does not follow from it and can in turn affect and change the person's character by chan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The answer is usually taken from the main object of these emotions, which derives from the two main aspects of (blameworthy) wrongdoing: the inner aspect of the wrongdoer's voluntary agency and the outer aspect of the deed realised in the world. There may be wrongdoings that lack one of these aspects, such as the unintended wrong or the unsuccessful attempt, but in a full-blown blameworthy wrongdoing, both aspects combine in a complex way that reflects in the complexity of the problem of retrospective moral emotions (Pacovská 2019). Authors who think that it is more important to focus on the deed favour guilt feelings and remorse as the morally appropriate retrospective emotions.…”
Section: Moral Emotions and Change Of Heartmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The answer is usually taken from the main object of these emotions, which derives from the two main aspects of (blameworthy) wrongdoing: the inner aspect of the wrongdoer's voluntary agency and the outer aspect of the deed realised in the world. There may be wrongdoings that lack one of these aspects, such as the unintended wrong or the unsuccessful attempt, but in a full-blown blameworthy wrongdoing, both aspects combine in a complex way that reflects in the complexity of the problem of retrospective moral emotions (Pacovská 2019). Authors who think that it is more important to focus on the deed favour guilt feelings and remorse as the morally appropriate retrospective emotions.…”
Section: Moral Emotions and Change Of Heartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…InPacovská (2019), I examine the tension in remorse between what one is revealed to be and what one has become in acting as one did.10 The cases of akrasia, or weak will, are an important exception here, because the person who succumbs to temptation inherently knows that she is succumbing and condemns it. But even these cases have been questioned in the past, most famously by Plato's Socrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an interesting discussion of a similar issue in relation to Dimitri Karamazov, seePacovská (2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%