2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9106-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral Agency, Profits and the Firm: Economic Revisions to the Friedman Theorem

Abstract: The paper reconstructs in economic terms Friedman's theorem that the only social responsibility of firms is to increase their profits while staying within legal and ethical rules. A model of three levels of moral conduct is attributed to the firm: (1) self-interested engagement in the market process itself, which reflects according to classical and neoclassical economics an ethical ideal;(2) the obeying of the "rules of the game," largely legal ones; and (3) the creation of ethical capital, which allows moral … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They frequently come with a higher price because of more expensive production techniques and they can only succeed in the marketplace if environmentally aware consumers are prepared to pay such additional costs. Such products and the type of revenue they reflect in the marketplace can be referred to as 'ethical capital' (Wagner-Tsukamoto, 2005, 2007a.…”
Section: Active Moral Agency and Managerial Views On The Generation Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They frequently come with a higher price because of more expensive production techniques and they can only succeed in the marketplace if environmentally aware consumers are prepared to pay such additional costs. Such products and the type of revenue they reflect in the marketplace can be referred to as 'ethical capital' (Wagner-Tsukamoto, 2005, 2007a.…”
Section: Active Moral Agency and Managerial Views On The Generation Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper here conceptualised active moral agency of the firm as the utilisation of ethical capital in firm-stakeholder interactions. This yielded a novel, economic reinterpretation of instrumental stakeholder theory (See also Wagner-Tsukamoto, 2007a) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-5;Himmelfarb 1995, p. 36;Windsor, 1980, p. 166 It can be argued that Quaker firms may have stood a better chance to successfully implement their ethics if they had approached the implementation of their ethics in economic terms. Three routes can here be distinguished (For a conceptual overview of these three routes, see Wagner-Tsukamoto, 2005, 2007b):…”
Section: Insert Figure 2 About Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding its very nature, they proposed and understood the economic approach as an alternative ethics to behavioural ethics. Hayek (1960Hayek ( , 1976, Buchanan (1975Buchanan ( , 1987a, and Friedman (1970) clearly sensed this, too, as did Homann's economic research on business ethics, interpreted as 'incentive ethics' (Homann, 1997(Homann, , 1999 see also Wagner-Tsukamoto 2005, 2007b. In this tradition of an economics approach to ethics, the present paper develops a critical perspective on behavioural business ethics, suggesting that the (institutional) economic approach may have to be prioritised over behavioural business ethics in order to promote business ethics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%