2012
DOI: 10.6027/tn2012-532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mopodeco

Abstract: Staff from the Danish Environmental Centers for data collections in coastal waters. The EU project WISER co-financed some of the additional data collection and statistical analysis carried out in chapter 4.1 (contract # 226273). This additional financiation allowed us to include a large extra dataset from Germany. SMHI delivered hydrographical datasets from the Shark data base. The University of Upsala provided data on nutrient run off. 24 MOPODECO The selected species are the ones that are either important ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But they also recognised that this tax was only one step in the right direction. [14][15][16][17][18] The Royal Australasian College of Physicians, the Public Health Association of Australia and other public health advocates favour a more comprehensive approach: one that addresses price and physical availability of alcohol, regulates the promotion of alcohol effectively and educates people about the risks of drinking. [19][20][21] The National Preventative Health Taskforce has provided a clear, evidence-based framework for government to implement.…”
Section: For Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But they also recognised that this tax was only one step in the right direction. [14][15][16][17][18] The Royal Australasian College of Physicians, the Public Health Association of Australia and other public health advocates favour a more comprehensive approach: one that addresses price and physical availability of alcohol, regulates the promotion of alcohol effectively and educates people about the risks of drinking. [19][20][21] The National Preventative Health Taskforce has provided a clear, evidence-based framework for government to implement.…”
Section: For Debatementioning
confidence: 99%