1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(96)03823-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moose browsing in young Scots pine stands in relation to forest management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been reported previously (e.g. Heikkilä 1990Heikkilä , 1993Heikkilä and Härkönen 1996;Härkönen 1998;Härkönen et al 2008b;Nikula et al 2008). Scots pine is a light demanding tree species, and shading reduces its height-and diameter growth, keeping the trees longer within moose browsing range and, possibly, making them more palatable to moose (Danell et al 1991b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results have been reported previously (e.g. Heikkilä 1990Heikkilä , 1993Heikkilä and Härkönen 1996;Härkönen 1998;Härkönen et al 2008b;Nikula et al 2008). Scots pine is a light demanding tree species, and shading reduces its height-and diameter growth, keeping the trees longer within moose browsing range and, possibly, making them more palatable to moose (Danell et al 1991b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We believe that this is due to the fact that we used the percentage of pines with recent damage as the response variable. A general pattern is that the absolute number of browsed/damaged trees or shoots increases with increasing food supply, whereas the proportion decreases (Lyly and Saksa 1992;Heikkilä and Härkönen 1996). As pointed out by Ball and Dahlgren (2002), this fact could be exploited in order to increase the number of undamaged pine trees at a given moose population density by increasing the number of Scots pine to 4000-5000 ha -1 in young stands, compared to recommendations of at least 1700 ha -1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is also in line with several earlier studies. Browsing of pine was common in the patches with high densities of aspen and rowan, the preferred and highly utilized deciduous tree species (Heikkilä and Härkönen 1996). High amounts of bush, especially aspen, increased damage to pine (Heikkilä 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these factors, like site productivity, have been found to increase browsing by moose and, thus, the risk of moose damage. However, studies of some other factors, like tree species composition (Heikkilä and Härkönen 1996;Ball and Dahlgren 2002) or the density of stands (Heikkilä and Mikkonen 1992) have produced contradictory results, regarding whether these factors increase or decrease the amount of browsing and, consequently, moose damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Rousset and Lepart (1999) suggest that Scots pine, because of its lower palatability, can colonize grasslands more rapidly than Quercus humilis, because ungulates avoid pines but heavily damage oaks located in these unprotected habitats. Danell et al (1991a), Heikkilä and Härkönen (1996), and Härkönen et al (1998) found that young Scots pines growing in monospecific stands are less damaged by moose (Alces alces) than those growing in mixed stands containing some other highly palatable tree species, such as aspen (Populus tremula), willows (Salix spp. ), or rowan (Sorbus aucuparia).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%